From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
December 11
File:Circle 300dpi.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep, but renaming to File:ManhattanGMAT logo.jpg. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 10:52, 25 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Circle 300dpi.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Ignoring the fact that it's poorly titled, this appears to be a company logo and so probably isn't freely licensed. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 06:09, 11 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- Keep, {{ pd-textlogo}}. / ƒETCH COMMS / 00:08, 14 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Station 51 street.JPG
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Station 51 street.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- a screen capture of google streetview seems unlikely to be a candidate for public domain Leebert ( talk) 16:05, 11 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete Agreed, indeed the copyright notice is usually right under the image on any browser I've seen google maps images on. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:45, 21 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:John Peel Mural, Brighton.JPG
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:29, 25 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:John Peel Mural, Brighton.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- No permission from artist who painted mural. UK Freedom of Panorama does not cover 2D artworks. Simon Speed ( talk) 19:27, 11 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Ruby subway.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Ruby subway.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Permission on image listed as own work, copyright holder and released o public domain. However the site [1] lists it on there, and claims a copyright notice. The user has uploaded many other copyvios to date, or is representing a company and not providing the correct permissions. Canterbury Tail talk 22:47, 11 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
December 11
File:Circle 300dpi.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep, but renaming to File:ManhattanGMAT logo.jpg. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 10:52, 25 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Circle 300dpi.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Ignoring the fact that it's poorly titled, this appears to be a company logo and so probably isn't freely licensed. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 06:09, 11 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- Keep, {{ pd-textlogo}}. / ƒETCH COMMS / 00:08, 14 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Station 51 street.JPG
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Station 51 street.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- a screen capture of google streetview seems unlikely to be a candidate for public domain Leebert ( talk) 16:05, 11 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete Agreed, indeed the copyright notice is usually right under the image on any browser I've seen google maps images on. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:45, 21 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:John Peel Mural, Brighton.JPG
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:29, 25 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:John Peel Mural, Brighton.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- No permission from artist who painted mural. UK Freedom of Panorama does not cover 2D artworks. Simon Speed ( talk) 19:27, 11 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Ruby subway.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Ruby subway.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Permission on image listed as own work, copyright holder and released o public domain. However the site [1] lists it on there, and claims a copyright notice. The user has uploaded many other copyvios to date, or is representing a company and not providing the correct permissions. Canterbury Tail talk 22:47, 11 December 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.