The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 16 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Memoria topares.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• scan from magazine claimed to be own work Janke | Talk 12:17, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
• Delete unused copyrighted image. — BQZip01 —  ^talk 21:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "Image_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUF or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:File name.ext ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• reason Shubhoshreemitra ( talk) 17:04, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Please remove the Public Domain Copyright

I agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license

http://i232.photobucket.com/albums/ee175/amitabhmitra/mdantsanebreathing6.jpg [1]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:20, 21 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Wellington-silva in 2009.jpg.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploaded by user who has uploaded other photos almost certainly not taken by him. Image is likely just a crop of a copyrighted image. Image lacks description. Jason Quinn ( talk) 18:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:20, 21 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Wellington Alves da Silva in 2010.jpg.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploaded by user who has uploaded other photos almost certainly not taken by him. Image is likely just a crop of a copyrighted image. Image lacks description. Jason Quinn ( talk) 18:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:  Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 April 21#File:Meg.jpg. — ξ ^xplicit 01:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Meg.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a commercial shot. Eeekster ( talk) 19:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; the file is non-free and is now tagged as such. - FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 04:06, 8 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:TEREOSLOGO.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is the logo of Tereos, a French company, but it is erroneously licensed as PD-self. Use in an infobox is fair use, but it requires copyright notice and FUR. Cnilep ( talk) 20:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
• Keep but ditto. WP:BEBOLD? — BQZip01 —  ^talk 01:21, 8 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; the file is non-free and now tagged as such. - FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 04:09, 8 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:World behind my wall single cover ml.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• WP user Jeodin claims to be the copyright holder of a Tokio Hotel album cover. Seems unlikely. —  JohnFromPinckney ( talk) 22:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
• Keep fix tag and apply FUR. This is a simple album cover fix. — BQZip01 —  ^talk 01:20, 8 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.