Kept as {{ PD-BritishGov}} and image description page updated accordingly. In the event that {{ PD-Australia}} should turn out to be more appropriate this image is still in the public domain. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Australian military insignia, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here
Skier Dude (
talk)
03:25, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:26, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Egyptian currency - clearly not PD - should probably be {{ non-free currency}} but listing here for additional comment by those more familiar w/foreign currency Skier Dude ( talk) 03:37, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Egyptian currency - clearly not PD - should probably be {{ non-free currency}} but listing here for additional comment by those more familiar w/foreign currency Skier Dude ( talk) 03:37, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Orphaned corporate/TV logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 03:39, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
watermarked as (c) Simionescu 2006; no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 03:41, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
watermarked (c) PA Simionescu 2006; no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 03:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Association logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 03:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The file was deleted as this is not a work of the United States Government and the NATO website claims copyright. In the event that permission to use this under an appropriate license is received it should be passed to OTRS. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
This is a work of NATO, not the US government, therefore the license is incorrect. Works produced by NATO are under copyright by default and cannot be assumed to be public domain or freely usable unless explicitly stated. Hux ( talk) 05:41, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The file was deleted as this is not a work of the United States Government and the NATO website claims copyright. In the event that permission to use this under an appropriate license is received it should be passed to OTRS. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
This is a work of NATO, not the US government, therefore the license is incorrect. Works produced by NATO are under copyright by default and cannot be assumed to be public domain or freely usable unless explicitly stated. Hux ( talk) 05:41, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The file was deleted as this is not a work of the United States Government and the NATO website claims copyright. In the event that permission to use this under an appropriate license is received it should be passed to OTRS. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
This is a work of NATO, not the US government, therefore the license is incorrect. Works produced by NATO are under copyright by default and cannot be assumed to be public domain or freely usable unless explicitly stated. Hux ( talk) 05:41, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:54, 17 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Looks like a scan of a newspaper photo, and no source information has been provided. -- El on ka 05:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned, appears to be publicity shot - uploader repeat (c) mis-stater Skier Dude ( talk) 05:52, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
novel cover licensed as CC3.0, no proof that uploader is (c) holder or released as CC Skier Dude ( talk) 05:59, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Corporate/conference logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 06:01, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned Corporate/conference logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 06:02, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned Corporate/conference logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 06:02, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
album cover; no indication uploader is (c) holder or it was CC released Skier Dude ( talk) 06:06, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
album cover; no indication uploader is (c) holder or it was CC released Skier Dude ( talk) 06:08, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
album cover; no indication uploader is (c) holder or it was CC released Skier Dude ( talk) 06:08, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
no source or metadata, appears to be professional headshot Skier Dude ( talk) 06:13, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
watermarked as "pablo studio", no indication uploader is (c) holder or image released in CC Skier Dude ( talk) 06:15, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned group logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 06:18, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
no source or metadata, appears to be screenshot or official photo Skier Dude ( talk) 06:26, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: deleted
Skier Dude (
talk)
04:58, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
The result of the discussion was: Retagged for lack of permission. Shell babelfish 08:25, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
No source and no evidence of permission (a cropped version of a previously deleted file). Memphisto ( talk) 10:45, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
compilation of seven pictures, none of them sourced Skier Dude ( talk) 19:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
album cover - unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 20:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned, screenshot, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 21:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
screenshot - unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 21:30, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Album cover, no source, highly unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 21:37, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Deleted. Since we've been unable to locate current copyright holder and photo is not quite yet public domain. Shell babelfish 08:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
possibly PD-old, but w/ no source, unable to confirm Skier Dude ( talk) 21:40, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The date cited for the photo of Woollard is an estimate. If the date is incorrect, it is likely earlier than 1925, perhaps 1922 or 1923.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC) reply
no metadata, no source, uploader has history of questionable uploads Skier Dude ( talk) 21:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Kept. Licensing tag now changed to appropriate PD claim. Shell babelfish 08:35, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
photoshopped old image, no source, therefore (c) claim can't be verified Skier Dude ( talk) 21:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
WRONG! As I explained in the article's talk page and several other places, this image has been public domain since 1920's because he is public figure. I appreciate the enthusiasm, but you seem to have over looked "details" in tagging files, especially the one I own and CREATED 03:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nysanda ( talk • contribs)
www.lamamartialart.com.au/Masters/LamaMasters.htm, http://www.liuhopafa.com/lama.htm
![]() | This image is now in the
public domain in
China because its term of copyright has expired there. According to copyright laws of the People's Republic of China (with legal jurisdiction in the mainland only, excluding
Hong Kong and
Macao) and the Republic of China (currently with jurisdiction in
Taiwan, the Pescadores, Quemoy, Matsu, etc.), all photographs enter the public domain 50 years after they were first published, or if unpublished 50 years from creation, and all non-photographic works enter the public domain fifty years after the death of the creator. To uploader: Please provide where the image was first published and who created it.
PD-China Public domain in China //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2009_October_3 | |||
|
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned Corporate logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 21:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned Corporate logo (at least most recent upload), no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 21:59, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned, no source, pretty obvious publicity headshot Skier Dude ( talk) 22:03, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
very 'unusual' pixelation leads me to believe that this is taken from another source, not provided Skier Dude ( talk) 22:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned, appears to be screenshot, no source or metadata Skier Dude ( talk) 22:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned Corporate logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 22:13, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
modified publicity shot - no indication uploader is (c) holder of base image Skier Dude ( talk) 22:22, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned, no sources given for images in collage - one modern image possible (c) violation Skier Dude ( talk) 22:41, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Corporate logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 22:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
screenshot, no source provided, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 22:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned Corporate/TV logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 22:45, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
no source or metadata, appears to be publicity photo Skier Dude ( talk) 22:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
album cover; no source, no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 22:48, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
album cover; no source; no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 22:49, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned film poster/cover - no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 22:52, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned Corporate logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 22:53, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
School logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 22:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
claims to be film poster; if so would not be CC licensed Skier Dude ( talk) 23:02, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
book cover, most likely not be released under cc license - no source Skier Dude ( talk) 23:03, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned, no source or metadata, appears to be publicity shot Skier Dude ( talk) 23:05, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
satellite shot, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Kept. Hand drawings from coat of arms descriptions can be released by contributor. Shell babelfish 08:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
School logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 23:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned City logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 23:08, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
This image is a copyvio. Found it on the net after some searching. It originates from the model's (Nadine Jansen) website and is originally called barlady03.jpg. Rosenzweig ( talk) 23:09, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
publicity headshot, unlikely uploader is c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
film poster, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder - orphaned Skier Dude ( talk) 23:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
film poster, unlikely uploader is (c) holder - no source Skier Dude ( talk) 23:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Corporate logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 23:23, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
corporate logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 23:24, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
watermarked www.thai-tour.com; no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:27, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
watermarked ???.???-tour.com - no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:28, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Sports team logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 23:31, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
older publicity shot - no source or metadata Skier Dude ( talk) 23:32, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
appears to be scan/pic of a book - appears to have (c) watermark in lower left corner Skier Dude ( talk) 23:33, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned, no source, watermarked as from anidadas.com Skier Dude ( talk) 23:34, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Corporate/city logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 23:36, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
book cover, orphaned, no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:40, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Kept and license changed to {{ PD-Because}} since we don't have a {{ PD-Sri Lanka}} yet. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
School logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here
Skier Dude (
talk)
23:41, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
book cover, no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
book cover, no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:43, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
comic strip panel taken from book - no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
book cover; no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
website /blog screencap - no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
scan taken from book (note reverse bleed-through print) - no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
School logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 23:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned government logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 23:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Kept as {{ PD-BritishGov}} and image description page updated accordingly. In the event that {{ PD-Australia}} should turn out to be more appropriate this image is still in the public domain. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Australian military insignia, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here
Skier Dude (
talk)
03:25, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:26, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Egyptian currency - clearly not PD - should probably be {{ non-free currency}} but listing here for additional comment by those more familiar w/foreign currency Skier Dude ( talk) 03:37, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Egyptian currency - clearly not PD - should probably be {{ non-free currency}} but listing here for additional comment by those more familiar w/foreign currency Skier Dude ( talk) 03:37, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Orphaned corporate/TV logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 03:39, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
watermarked as (c) Simionescu 2006; no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 03:41, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
watermarked (c) PA Simionescu 2006; no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 03:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Association logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 03:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The file was deleted as this is not a work of the United States Government and the NATO website claims copyright. In the event that permission to use this under an appropriate license is received it should be passed to OTRS. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
This is a work of NATO, not the US government, therefore the license is incorrect. Works produced by NATO are under copyright by default and cannot be assumed to be public domain or freely usable unless explicitly stated. Hux ( talk) 05:41, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The file was deleted as this is not a work of the United States Government and the NATO website claims copyright. In the event that permission to use this under an appropriate license is received it should be passed to OTRS. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
This is a work of NATO, not the US government, therefore the license is incorrect. Works produced by NATO are under copyright by default and cannot be assumed to be public domain or freely usable unless explicitly stated. Hux ( talk) 05:41, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The file was deleted as this is not a work of the United States Government and the NATO website claims copyright. In the event that permission to use this under an appropriate license is received it should be passed to OTRS. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
This is a work of NATO, not the US government, therefore the license is incorrect. Works produced by NATO are under copyright by default and cannot be assumed to be public domain or freely usable unless explicitly stated. Hux ( talk) 05:41, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:54, 17 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Looks like a scan of a newspaper photo, and no source information has been provided. -- El on ka 05:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned, appears to be publicity shot - uploader repeat (c) mis-stater Skier Dude ( talk) 05:52, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
novel cover licensed as CC3.0, no proof that uploader is (c) holder or released as CC Skier Dude ( talk) 05:59, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Corporate/conference logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 06:01, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned Corporate/conference logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 06:02, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned Corporate/conference logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 06:02, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
album cover; no indication uploader is (c) holder or it was CC released Skier Dude ( talk) 06:06, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
album cover; no indication uploader is (c) holder or it was CC released Skier Dude ( talk) 06:08, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
album cover; no indication uploader is (c) holder or it was CC released Skier Dude ( talk) 06:08, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
no source or metadata, appears to be professional headshot Skier Dude ( talk) 06:13, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
watermarked as "pablo studio", no indication uploader is (c) holder or image released in CC Skier Dude ( talk) 06:15, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned group logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 06:18, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
no source or metadata, appears to be screenshot or official photo Skier Dude ( talk) 06:26, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: deleted
Skier Dude (
talk)
04:58, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
The result of the discussion was: Retagged for lack of permission. Shell babelfish 08:25, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
No source and no evidence of permission (a cropped version of a previously deleted file). Memphisto ( talk) 10:45, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
compilation of seven pictures, none of them sourced Skier Dude ( talk) 19:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
album cover - unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 20:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned, screenshot, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 21:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
screenshot - unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 21:30, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Album cover, no source, highly unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 21:37, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Deleted. Since we've been unable to locate current copyright holder and photo is not quite yet public domain. Shell babelfish 08:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
possibly PD-old, but w/ no source, unable to confirm Skier Dude ( talk) 21:40, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The date cited for the photo of Woollard is an estimate. If the date is incorrect, it is likely earlier than 1925, perhaps 1922 or 1923.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC) reply
no metadata, no source, uploader has history of questionable uploads Skier Dude ( talk) 21:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Kept. Licensing tag now changed to appropriate PD claim. Shell babelfish 08:35, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
photoshopped old image, no source, therefore (c) claim can't be verified Skier Dude ( talk) 21:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
WRONG! As I explained in the article's talk page and several other places, this image has been public domain since 1920's because he is public figure. I appreciate the enthusiasm, but you seem to have over looked "details" in tagging files, especially the one I own and CREATED 03:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nysanda ( talk • contribs)
www.lamamartialart.com.au/Masters/LamaMasters.htm, http://www.liuhopafa.com/lama.htm
![]() | This image is now in the
public domain in
China because its term of copyright has expired there. According to copyright laws of the People's Republic of China (with legal jurisdiction in the mainland only, excluding
Hong Kong and
Macao) and the Republic of China (currently with jurisdiction in
Taiwan, the Pescadores, Quemoy, Matsu, etc.), all photographs enter the public domain 50 years after they were first published, or if unpublished 50 years from creation, and all non-photographic works enter the public domain fifty years after the death of the creator. To uploader: Please provide where the image was first published and who created it.
PD-China Public domain in China //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2009_October_3 | |||
|
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned Corporate logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 21:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned Corporate logo (at least most recent upload), no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 21:59, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned, no source, pretty obvious publicity headshot Skier Dude ( talk) 22:03, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
very 'unusual' pixelation leads me to believe that this is taken from another source, not provided Skier Dude ( talk) 22:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned, appears to be screenshot, no source or metadata Skier Dude ( talk) 22:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned Corporate logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 22:13, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
modified publicity shot - no indication uploader is (c) holder of base image Skier Dude ( talk) 22:22, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned, no sources given for images in collage - one modern image possible (c) violation Skier Dude ( talk) 22:41, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Corporate logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 22:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
screenshot, no source provided, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 22:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned Corporate/TV logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 22:45, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
no source or metadata, appears to be publicity photo Skier Dude ( talk) 22:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
album cover; no source, no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 22:48, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
album cover; no source; no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 22:49, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned film poster/cover - no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 22:52, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned Corporate logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 22:53, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
School logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 22:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
claims to be film poster; if so would not be CC licensed Skier Dude ( talk) 23:02, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
book cover, most likely not be released under cc license - no source Skier Dude ( talk) 23:03, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned, no source or metadata, appears to be publicity shot Skier Dude ( talk) 23:05, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
satellite shot, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Kept. Hand drawings from coat of arms descriptions can be released by contributor. Shell babelfish 08:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
School logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 23:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned City logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 23:08, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
This image is a copyvio. Found it on the net after some searching. It originates from the model's (Nadine Jansen) website and is originally called barlady03.jpg. Rosenzweig ( talk) 23:09, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
publicity headshot, unlikely uploader is c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
film poster, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder - orphaned Skier Dude ( talk) 23:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
film poster, unlikely uploader is (c) holder - no source Skier Dude ( talk) 23:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Corporate logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 23:23, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
corporate logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 23:24, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
watermarked www.thai-tour.com; no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:27, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
watermarked ???.???-tour.com - no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:28, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Sports team logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 23:31, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
older publicity shot - no source or metadata Skier Dude ( talk) 23:32, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
appears to be scan/pic of a book - appears to have (c) watermark in lower left corner Skier Dude ( talk) 23:33, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned, no source, watermarked as from anidadas.com Skier Dude ( talk) 23:34, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Corporate/city logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 23:36, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
book cover, orphaned, no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:40, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Kept and license changed to {{ PD-Because}} since we don't have a {{ PD-Sri Lanka}} yet. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
School logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here
Skier Dude (
talk)
23:41, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
book cover, no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
book cover, no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:43, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
comic strip panel taken from book - no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
book cover; no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
website /blog screencap - no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
scan taken from book (note reverse bleed-through print) - no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
School logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 23:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned government logo, no source given, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for unofficial images here Skier Dude ( talk) 23:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply