< October 20 | October 22 > |
---|
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
web resolution, no metadata, no source, cross-hatching of background makes it appear this was scanned/photo'd from another source Skier Dude ( talk) 02:25, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Image is shown as copyrighted elsewhere on the web. Lx45803 ( talk) 02:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
claim of "self" and watermark disagree on (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 04:06, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
claim of "self" and watermark disagree on (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 04:06, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
claim of "self" and watermark disagree on (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 04:07, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
claim of "self" and watermark disagree on (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 04:07, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
claim of "self" and watermark disagree on (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 04:07, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
claim of "self" and watermark disagree on (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 04:07, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned, appears to be album cover, no target article provided Skier Dude ( talk) 04:45, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
corporate logo - no source provided, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude ( talk) 05:09, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
from name appears to be CD cover - unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 05:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned school logo w/ CC3.0 license Skier Dude ( talk) 05:39, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC) reply
No fair use/licensing rationale; source appears to be unfree; problematic title Belinrahs| talktome⁄ ididit 16:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Not sure we can treat a photo of a posted historical marker any differently from a photo of a page of text. Shouldn't the original creator retain copyright here? ( ESkog)( Talk) 18:48, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The uploader write that the photo came from clive edwards, and that edwards is the author, but there is no otrs permission. given that the uploader has uploaded other similar images which have been deleted, it is a fair bet this is likely a copyvio also. Russavia Dialogue 19:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. Tagged as a non-free file, no possibility of copyright violation. — ξ xplicit 21:37, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The source is Italian Wikipedia, but the file was deleted there, because a source wasn't cited. Amir E. Aharoni ( talk) 21:39, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
< October 20 | October 22 > |
---|
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
web resolution, no metadata, no source, cross-hatching of background makes it appear this was scanned/photo'd from another source Skier Dude ( talk) 02:25, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Image is shown as copyrighted elsewhere on the web. Lx45803 ( talk) 02:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
claim of "self" and watermark disagree on (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 04:06, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
claim of "self" and watermark disagree on (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 04:06, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
claim of "self" and watermark disagree on (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 04:07, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
claim of "self" and watermark disagree on (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 04:07, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
claim of "self" and watermark disagree on (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 04:07, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
claim of "self" and watermark disagree on (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 04:07, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned, appears to be album cover, no target article provided Skier Dude ( talk) 04:45, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
corporate logo - no source provided, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude ( talk) 05:09, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
from name appears to be CD cover - unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 05:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
orphaned school logo w/ CC3.0 license Skier Dude ( talk) 05:39, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC) reply
No fair use/licensing rationale; source appears to be unfree; problematic title Belinrahs| talktome⁄ ididit 16:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Not sure we can treat a photo of a posted historical marker any differently from a photo of a page of text. Shouldn't the original creator retain copyright here? ( ESkog)( Talk) 18:48, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The uploader write that the photo came from clive edwards, and that edwards is the author, but there is no otrs permission. given that the uploader has uploaded other similar images which have been deleted, it is a fair bet this is likely a copyvio also. Russavia Dialogue 19:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. Tagged as a non-free file, no possibility of copyright violation. — ξ xplicit 21:37, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The source is Italian Wikipedia, but the file was deleted there, because a source wasn't cited. Amir E. Aharoni ( talk) 21:39, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply