| < October 18 | October 20 > |
|---|
October 19
File:SyngmanRheeOath.jpg
Original tag was {{Public Domain}}, which is deprecated now. The evidence given in the upload and the original web page is not enough for me to say with certainty whether it's in the public domain or not. -- LarryGilbert ( talk) 00:27, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply
File:Sethu lakshmi2.gif
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:26, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply
appears to be a painted portrait, not an original photograph, uploader may have taken a photograph of the portrait and not understood the nature of a derivative work. The small size of the file, tends to belie the uploader's claim of ownership. Lastly, Sethu Lakshmi Bayi appears to be about 35 in the portrait, which would mean that if it were a photograph that it was taken about 1930. Color photographs in 1930 were very rare. Bejnar ( talk) 02:08, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- It is not a photo but from a picture of a portrait made about 1928. It was placed in the Womens College in Trivandrum and as a public portrait made so many years ago doesnt have a copyright. Please let me know if you need any more clarifications. Thanks Manu rocks ( talk) 12:49, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- Could not paste pui template on file page. -- Bejnar ( talk) 02:14, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:SenatorKirk.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply
This is a cropped version of a file that was already deleted. The fact that it was posted on the U.S. Senate's website does not mean the government holds the copyright. Rrius ( talk) 05:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- Delete already deleted at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 September 24#File:PaulGKirkJr.jpg Hekerui ( talk) 10:10, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- Delete As stated above, deleted from Commons previously. Obvious copyright violation. Gage ( talk) 06:25, 24 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- Delete per Rrius. Cassandro ( talk) 15:25, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Surge Arrestor 716 Connector.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Unlikely the uploader is the copyright holder. - FASTILYsock (TALK) 06:25, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Anni 4.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply
According to this post on uploader's talk page. -- Blacklake ( talk) 14:21, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
| < October 18 | October 20 > |
|---|
October 19
File:SyngmanRheeOath.jpg
Original tag was {{Public Domain}}, which is deprecated now. The evidence given in the upload and the original web page is not enough for me to say with certainty whether it's in the public domain or not. -- LarryGilbert ( talk) 00:27, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply
File:Sethu lakshmi2.gif
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:26, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply
appears to be a painted portrait, not an original photograph, uploader may have taken a photograph of the portrait and not understood the nature of a derivative work. The small size of the file, tends to belie the uploader's claim of ownership. Lastly, Sethu Lakshmi Bayi appears to be about 35 in the portrait, which would mean that if it were a photograph that it was taken about 1930. Color photographs in 1930 were very rare. Bejnar ( talk) 02:08, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- It is not a photo but from a picture of a portrait made about 1928. It was placed in the Womens College in Trivandrum and as a public portrait made so many years ago doesnt have a copyright. Please let me know if you need any more clarifications. Thanks Manu rocks ( talk) 12:49, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- Could not paste pui template on file page. -- Bejnar ( talk) 02:14, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:SenatorKirk.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply
This is a cropped version of a file that was already deleted. The fact that it was posted on the U.S. Senate's website does not mean the government holds the copyright. Rrius ( talk) 05:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- Delete already deleted at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 September 24#File:PaulGKirkJr.jpg Hekerui ( talk) 10:10, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- Delete As stated above, deleted from Commons previously. Obvious copyright violation. Gage ( talk) 06:25, 24 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- Delete per Rrius. Cassandro ( talk) 15:25, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Surge Arrestor 716 Connector.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Unlikely the uploader is the copyright holder. - FASTILYsock (TALK) 06:25, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Anni 4.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply
According to this post on uploader's talk page. -- Blacklake ( talk) 14:21, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.