The result of the discussion was: Delete. Discussion and review of the law in question indicates that while a subject release may not be required, the photograph is not free of copyright. Shell babelfish 17:13, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The "es libre la publicación" complete sentence is "Es libre la publicación del retrato cuando se relacione con fines científicos, didácticos y en general culturales, o con hechos o acontecimientos de interés público o que se hubieran desarrollado en público." In english, "The publication of the portrait is free when it is related with scientific purposes, didactic and cultural in general, or with facts or events of public interest or which took place in public space". As you can see, it's closer to a "fair use" clause than to a "ineligible for copyright" one. Cultural topics can't be ineligible for copyright: that includes music, books, portraits, sculptures; everything that is typically copyrightable. Even more, such asumption would be in direct contradiction with the 1º article. This law is of 1933, if there was such a gross contradiction it would have been corrected very long ago. MBelgrano ( talk) 12:46, 1 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:14, 2 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:14, 2 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Shell babelfish 17:16, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Tagged for deletion as missing fair use rationale. Shell babelfish 17:19, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Image now commons File:Bérégovoy.jpg. Shell babelfish 17:24, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. hr:Josip Horvat Međimurec indicates that he did not start painting until 1924. Shell babelfish 17:29, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: File does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Shell babelfish 17:31, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Discussion and review of the law in question indicates that while a subject release may not be required, the photograph is not free of copyright. Shell babelfish 17:13, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The "es libre la publicación" complete sentence is "Es libre la publicación del retrato cuando se relacione con fines científicos, didácticos y en general culturales, o con hechos o acontecimientos de interés público o que se hubieran desarrollado en público." In english, "The publication of the portrait is free when it is related with scientific purposes, didactic and cultural in general, or with facts or events of public interest or which took place in public space". As you can see, it's closer to a "fair use" clause than to a "ineligible for copyright" one. Cultural topics can't be ineligible for copyright: that includes music, books, portraits, sculptures; everything that is typically copyrightable. Even more, such asumption would be in direct contradiction with the 1º article. This law is of 1933, if there was such a gross contradiction it would have been corrected very long ago. MBelgrano ( talk) 12:46, 1 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:14, 2 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:14, 2 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Shell babelfish 17:16, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Tagged for deletion as missing fair use rationale. Shell babelfish 17:19, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Image now commons File:Bérégovoy.jpg. Shell babelfish 17:24, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. hr:Josip Horvat Međimurec indicates that he did not start painting until 1924. Shell babelfish 17:29, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: File does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Shell babelfish 17:31, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply