From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
November 23
File:Greaves hall dining room compare.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC) reply
- Combination of two images; agf on top image as being uploader's, however, the lower image is probably PD-old, but without the source, it is not possible to tell. Skier Dude ( talk) 07:20, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Palace hotel birkdale southport.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: kept as fixed.
Skier Dude (
talk)
02:36, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Old image - no source, only metadata is from Picasa, most likely not PD-self, but without source it is not possible to tell the correct license Skier Dude ( talk) 07:21, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- Now correctly attributed as a public domain non-free image with justifications. Am working with uploader to tidy his image licences. 21st CENTURY GREENSTUFF 15:32, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Kingtalal.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:51, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
- File:Kingtalal.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- See - http://www.kinghussein.gov.jo/copyright.html - Sourcing given in image is generic Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:21, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Irishgraph.PNG
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC) reply
- File:Irishgraph.PNG ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Whose data? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:02, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Bcstv2005.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:51, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
- File:Bcstv2005.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Data source not listed/noted Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Cyprusregiment.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The badge itself is indeed {{ PD-BritishGov}} but the author may choose any license he wishes as this is not a 2-dimensional artefact. Returned to original {{ GFDL}} licensing. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:26, 20 December 2009 (UTC) reply
- File:Cyprusregiment.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Militaria - Insignia, Designs are normally protected? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:21, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The image is of the cap badge of a long defunct regiment. This particular badge belongs to and was worn by my father, who was in the regiment and is mentioned in the article. What more do you want? By your reckoning every image on this article
Cap badge should also be tagged. Why aren't they?
Jack1956 (
talk)
17:49, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Additional tags added.
Jack1956 (
talk)
19:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Wouldn't the design of the cap badge be expired Crown Copyright? Particularly as the regiment appears to have been disbanded in 1950. Nigel Ish ( talk) 21:45, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- Additional tags added.
Jack1956 (
talk)
19:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Paul-Tseng 500.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC) reply
- File:Paul-Tseng 500.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Probably copied from http://orion.uwaterloo.ca/~hwolkowi/henry/reports/talks.d/t08talks.d/08mopta.d/pics.d/peterrpics.d/portraits.d/ with the image captioned unlikely to be the work of the uploader MilborneOne ( talk)
- Delete as copyright violation. Hekerui ( talk) 14:50, 24 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- I am the uploader and I've tried to make this right for several times. Once I have asked the original photographer to send an email to one of your editors to confirm, but the picture still got deleted. Could you please inform me how to do to keep the picture? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdwang ( talk • contribs) 18:14, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:IYHF PYHA logo2.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC) reply
- File:IYHF PYHA logo2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This image is actually the logos of two organizations that have been combined together. Although I can believe that the combining of the two logos was done by the editor that uploaded the image, the editor is not the copyright owner of either logo and as such, the resulting image is a copyright violation. Whpq ( talk) 20:54, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:JamesWiggins.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: kept as fixed.
Skier Dude (
talk)
06:13, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
reply
- File:JamesWiggins.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unsourced with no evidence it is the work of the United States State Department, same image on web at http://www.americanantiquarian.org/wiggins.htm is not a government website. MilborneOne ( talk) 20:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- It is a state dept. work, heres the link: ( http://www.archive.usun.state.gov/ambassadors/history/wiggins.html )-- [[User: Duffy2032|Duffy2032]] ( talk) 01:58, 24 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- OK objection withdrawn - might be useful to add the link to the file page. MilborneOne ( talk) 18:48, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- Done, thanks for the tip.-- [[User: Duffy2032|Duffy2032]] ( talk) 05:27, 30 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Anthony Clark Arend.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC) reply
- File:Anthony Clark Arend.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Exit data does not match source "Rafael Suanes" professional photographer and copyright 2009 Georgetown Univ MilborneOne ( talk) 23:21, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The photo is from Flickr. I mistakenly uploaded it here instead of the commons when I was in a rush today. Which is why I put it up for speedy deletion after re-uploading this to the commons, so this file should be deleted as a duplicate whether or not its free. I don't know why we needed to remove my speedy deletion request to put a notice up here.-- Patrick { oѺ∞} 04:25, 24 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- Rafael Suanes actually emailed me back claiming the photo as his own, from the Tropaia awards he says. So I guess both this and the other half, File:Robert_Gallucci.jpg, are his too.-- Patrick { oѺ∞} 15:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
November 23
File:Greaves hall dining room compare.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC) reply
- Combination of two images; agf on top image as being uploader's, however, the lower image is probably PD-old, but without the source, it is not possible to tell. Skier Dude ( talk) 07:20, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Palace hotel birkdale southport.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: kept as fixed.
Skier Dude (
talk)
02:36, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Old image - no source, only metadata is from Picasa, most likely not PD-self, but without source it is not possible to tell the correct license Skier Dude ( talk) 07:21, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- Now correctly attributed as a public domain non-free image with justifications. Am working with uploader to tidy his image licences. 21st CENTURY GREENSTUFF 15:32, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Kingtalal.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:51, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
- File:Kingtalal.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- See - http://www.kinghussein.gov.jo/copyright.html - Sourcing given in image is generic Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:21, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Irishgraph.PNG
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC) reply
- File:Irishgraph.PNG ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Whose data? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:02, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Bcstv2005.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:51, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
- File:Bcstv2005.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Data source not listed/noted Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Cyprusregiment.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The badge itself is indeed {{ PD-BritishGov}} but the author may choose any license he wishes as this is not a 2-dimensional artefact. Returned to original {{ GFDL}} licensing. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:26, 20 December 2009 (UTC) reply
- File:Cyprusregiment.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Militaria - Insignia, Designs are normally protected? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:21, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The image is of the cap badge of a long defunct regiment. This particular badge belongs to and was worn by my father, who was in the regiment and is mentioned in the article. What more do you want? By your reckoning every image on this article
Cap badge should also be tagged. Why aren't they?
Jack1956 (
talk)
17:49, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Additional tags added.
Jack1956 (
talk)
19:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Wouldn't the design of the cap badge be expired Crown Copyright? Particularly as the regiment appears to have been disbanded in 1950. Nigel Ish ( talk) 21:45, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- Additional tags added.
Jack1956 (
talk)
19:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Paul-Tseng 500.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC) reply
- File:Paul-Tseng 500.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Probably copied from http://orion.uwaterloo.ca/~hwolkowi/henry/reports/talks.d/t08talks.d/08mopta.d/pics.d/peterrpics.d/portraits.d/ with the image captioned unlikely to be the work of the uploader MilborneOne ( talk)
- Delete as copyright violation. Hekerui ( talk) 14:50, 24 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- I am the uploader and I've tried to make this right for several times. Once I have asked the original photographer to send an email to one of your editors to confirm, but the picture still got deleted. Could you please inform me how to do to keep the picture? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdwang ( talk • contribs) 18:14, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:IYHF PYHA logo2.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC) reply
- File:IYHF PYHA logo2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This image is actually the logos of two organizations that have been combined together. Although I can believe that the combining of the two logos was done by the editor that uploaded the image, the editor is not the copyright owner of either logo and as such, the resulting image is a copyright violation. Whpq ( talk) 20:54, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:JamesWiggins.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: kept as fixed.
Skier Dude (
talk)
06:13, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
reply
- File:JamesWiggins.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unsourced with no evidence it is the work of the United States State Department, same image on web at http://www.americanantiquarian.org/wiggins.htm is not a government website. MilborneOne ( talk) 20:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- It is a state dept. work, heres the link: ( http://www.archive.usun.state.gov/ambassadors/history/wiggins.html )-- [[User: Duffy2032|Duffy2032]] ( talk) 01:58, 24 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- OK objection withdrawn - might be useful to add the link to the file page. MilborneOne ( talk) 18:48, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- Done, thanks for the tip.-- [[User: Duffy2032|Duffy2032]] ( talk) 05:27, 30 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Anthony Clark Arend.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC) reply
- File:Anthony Clark Arend.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Exit data does not match source "Rafael Suanes" professional photographer and copyright 2009 Georgetown Univ MilborneOne ( talk) 23:21, 23 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The photo is from Flickr. I mistakenly uploaded it here instead of the commons when I was in a rush today. Which is why I put it up for speedy deletion after re-uploading this to the commons, so this file should be deleted as a duplicate whether or not its free. I don't know why we needed to remove my speedy deletion request to put a notice up here.-- Patrick { oѺ∞} 04:25, 24 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- Rafael Suanes actually emailed me back claiming the photo as his own, from the Tropaia awards he says. So I guess both this and the other half, File:Robert_Gallucci.jpg, are his too.-- Patrick { oѺ∞} 15:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.