The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:33, 26 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Unlikely that the image is licensed under a GFDL license. Mosmof ( talk) 04:34, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: No action. Being handled (along with other similar uploads) at Wikipedia:Contributor_copyright_investigations/Arab_League. Shell babelfish 04:51, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:33, 26 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Hello. I posted the file. It is a promotional photo, taken of me and owned by me. I have no idea why it was deleted but I'd like it back thank you. TimEllis43 ( talk) 12:59, 3 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Shell babelfish 04:53, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Shell babelfish 04:55, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Converted to Fair Use. No evidence of permission, fair use and rationale added for article on comic book; image removed from author article since no rationale was available. Shell babelfish 05:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Converted to Fair Use. No evidence of permission, fair use and rationale added for article on comic book; image removed from author article since no rationale was available. Shell babelfish 05:04, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Amorymeltzer ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:43, 26 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Converted to Fair Use. Image is the seal; added fair use and rationale. Shell babelfish 05:09, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Converted to Fair Use. Converted to fair use with rationale for logo; uploaded most recent logo per official website. Shell babelfish 05:14, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Convert to Fair Use. Verified this is current logo, converted to fair use and added rationale. Shell babelfish 05:19, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Unable to determine if this is legitimate logo or halloween fun; no source and no evidence of permission. Shell babelfish 05:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: 'Delete. Unable to verify that this is official logo; different logo in article and on official website. No evidence of permission. Shell babelfish 05:25, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
It is the badge of my Secondary School and has no copyright or trademark associated with it. It was designed by a fellow pupil. If it isn't under the right sections or liscence prehaps you could point me in the right direction? Glenny127 ( talk) 17:24, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. No evidence this logo is associated with article subject; no evidence of permission. Shell babelfish 05:27, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. No evidence this is an official logo, no source and no evidence of permission. Shell babelfish 05:28, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Converted to Fair Use. Appears to be seal of city; added fair use and rationale. Shell babelfish 05:31, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Converted to fair use. No evidence of permission but does appear to be official logo; converted to fair use with rationale. Shell babelfish 05:33, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Converted to Fair Use. Official website shows this as logo; no evidence of permission so converted to fair use. Shell babelfish 15:55, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Deleted. Unable to verify that this is an official logo; no evidence of permission. Shell babelfish 16:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Replaced. Appears to be marketing material but no evidence of permission, replaced with official logo and converted to fair use with rationale. Shell babelfish 16:16, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Kept. Corrected source and licensing. Shell babelfish 16:25, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:56, 20 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. At first thought this was likely pd due to being published without a copyright notice in 1969, however, further research made me realize that this was likely published in Canada not the US. Shell babelfish 16:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Jung Ryu Won, who is also the image subject Jezhotwells ( talk) 18:42, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Jung Ryu Won, who is also the image subject Jezhotwells ( talk) 18:45, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Lee Da Hae Daum, who is also the image subject Jezhotwells ( talk) 18:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Suki (JunkiChina) Jezhotwells ( talk) 18:47, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:33, 26 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Unlikely that the image is licensed under a GFDL license. Mosmof ( talk) 04:34, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: No action. Being handled (along with other similar uploads) at Wikipedia:Contributor_copyright_investigations/Arab_League. Shell babelfish 04:51, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:33, 26 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Hello. I posted the file. It is a promotional photo, taken of me and owned by me. I have no idea why it was deleted but I'd like it back thank you. TimEllis43 ( talk) 12:59, 3 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Shell babelfish 04:53, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Shell babelfish 04:55, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Converted to Fair Use. No evidence of permission, fair use and rationale added for article on comic book; image removed from author article since no rationale was available. Shell babelfish 05:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Converted to Fair Use. No evidence of permission, fair use and rationale added for article on comic book; image removed from author article since no rationale was available. Shell babelfish 05:04, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Amorymeltzer ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:43, 26 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Converted to Fair Use. Image is the seal; added fair use and rationale. Shell babelfish 05:09, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Converted to Fair Use. Converted to fair use with rationale for logo; uploaded most recent logo per official website. Shell babelfish 05:14, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Convert to Fair Use. Verified this is current logo, converted to fair use and added rationale. Shell babelfish 05:19, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Unable to determine if this is legitimate logo or halloween fun; no source and no evidence of permission. Shell babelfish 05:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: 'Delete. Unable to verify that this is official logo; different logo in article and on official website. No evidence of permission. Shell babelfish 05:25, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
It is the badge of my Secondary School and has no copyright or trademark associated with it. It was designed by a fellow pupil. If it isn't under the right sections or liscence prehaps you could point me in the right direction? Glenny127 ( talk) 17:24, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. No evidence this logo is associated with article subject; no evidence of permission. Shell babelfish 05:27, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. No evidence this is an official logo, no source and no evidence of permission. Shell babelfish 05:28, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Converted to Fair Use. Appears to be seal of city; added fair use and rationale. Shell babelfish 05:31, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Converted to fair use. No evidence of permission but does appear to be official logo; converted to fair use with rationale. Shell babelfish 05:33, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Converted to Fair Use. Official website shows this as logo; no evidence of permission so converted to fair use. Shell babelfish 15:55, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Deleted. Unable to verify that this is an official logo; no evidence of permission. Shell babelfish 16:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Replaced. Appears to be marketing material but no evidence of permission, replaced with official logo and converted to fair use with rationale. Shell babelfish 16:16, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Kept. Corrected source and licensing. Shell babelfish 16:25, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:56, 20 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. At first thought this was likely pd due to being published without a copyright notice in 1969, however, further research made me realize that this was likely published in Canada not the US. Shell babelfish 16:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Jung Ryu Won, who is also the image subject Jezhotwells ( talk) 18:42, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Jung Ryu Won, who is also the image subject Jezhotwells ( talk) 18:45, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Lee Da Hae Daum, who is also the image subject Jezhotwells ( talk) 18:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Suki (JunkiChina) Jezhotwells ( talk) 18:47, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply