The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not deleted. – Quadell ^{( talk)} 02:54, 12 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Image of an Albanian identity card (presumably the uploader's) with personal info blacked out. Claimed to be uploader's own work, but as a work of the Albanian government, they would still hold the rights. Per the detailed description on Commons, government logos are public domain, but not all government works are. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 01:13, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Hmm, "the official texts of a legal, administrative, legislative, political nature" ViperSnake151  Talk  11:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

I'm convinced that this falls within the Albanian exception for government logos etc., and thereby is in the public domain. IronGargoyle ( talk) 13:52, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not deleted. – Quadell ^{( talk)} 02:57, 12 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Same as above, the other side of the card. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 01:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Public domain, per above. IronGargoyle ( talk) 13:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Please do not remove the immage. You can contact me in privat if you want. alblefter 22.25, 28 May 2009. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alblefter ( talk • contribs) 20:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:18, 7 June 2009 (UTC) reply

GFDL licence claimed, but unverifiable as there was no trace provided to this "official" photo; was also seen at http://www.president.ualberta.ca/campbell.cfm, which suggests this is a publicity photo that is generally non-free. Dl2000 ( talk) 04:30, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by DragonflySixtyseven ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

This looks like a screen capture from the Van Helsing movie. I see no reason why this should be PD. -- Luk ^talk 07:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC) reply

User has uploaded several other copyrighted images claiming them to be free; the source given doesn't provide sufficient information to check whether this image is under an appropriate license. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 16:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Delete. This is all rights reserved on Flickr. [1] IronGargoyle ( talk) 17:33, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not deleted. – Quadell ^{( talk)} 17:35, 26 June 2009 (UTC) reply

User is unlikely to have the rights to release this image into the public domain. Stifle ( talk) 16:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

I'm pretty sure this browser is freely licensed, and any icons are de minimis in my opinion. IronGargoyle ( talk) 01:27, 28 May 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Just cleaned up 10-15 copyvios from the uploader of this image; can't find the source of this one but I suspect it is also a violation. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 18:34, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Just cleaned up 10-15 copyvios from the uploader of this image; can't find the source of this one but I suspect it is also a violation. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 18:35, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Uses at least two, and probably all three, images from other websites (Irvine Patnick image is used in [2]; Nick Clegg image at [3]). The user's claim that they created the work entirely themselves is highly dubious. Warofdreams talk 23:58, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.