The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
This image was taken from Flickr, where it is "All rights reserved". See http://www.flickr.com/photos/kamran2171/2300681962/ Fences and windows ( talk) 02:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
There is no source for the image given on the web page it was uploaded from, and I doubt very much that this is a contemporary portrait as stated. It looks modern to me. Wikipedia should not state that this is a contemporary likeness unless it can be shown that it is. RobertG ♬ talk 07:51, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Graeme Bartlett (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
08:44, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
This is a photo by Tim Dominick of The State here. 66.57.188.49 ( talk) 09:23, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Closedmouth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
08:59, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
Image is by Juan Blas from the Daily Gamecock here. Uploader does not claim to be Juan Blas nor does uploader credit Juan Blas. Ripping off a kid who works at a school newspaper is disgusting and shameful. 66.57.188.49 ( talk) 09:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
Other military-related uploads from this user were copyright violations. The lack of metadata on this one, as well as the similarity in subject matter, leads me to believe this one is too - but I can't find the original source, so listing here instead of speedying. ( ESkog)( Talk) 12:46, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
User claims to have taken picture themselves, but image is thumbnail sized and available at http://www.ramadhan.u-net.com/images/noor_msq.jpg. Otterathome ( talk) 13:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
Image is thumbnail sized and appears to be a duplicate violation, likely taken from ramadhan.u-net.com, see Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2009_May_19#File:Noor_msq-1-.jpg Otterathome ( talk) 13:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
EVula (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
15:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
Contains a copyrighted element from After Dark. Note that the uploader mistakenly claims free use in the history [1], when parody would only be a justification for fair use. Also note that this image is found only outside of article space. the wub "?!" 13:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
EVula (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
15:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
Similar to Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 May 19#File:Flyingtoaster star.gif, contains elements from the copyrighted software After Dark. the wub "?!" 13:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
Uploader has several copyvios; can't find the original source on this one but suspect it is as well. ( ESkog)( Talk) 15:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
The image appears in this property management website: http://www.amerimar.com/detaildisplay.php?id=19 Not certain if it's the original work of the uploader. Mosmof ( talk) 16:24, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
There is no evidence that the author has died over 70 years. Vinhtantran ( talk) 16:25, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
File is marked "all rights reserved" on Flickr, and the original Flickr info was mysterious removed since the initial upload: http://www.flickr.com/photos/40804010@N00/945117880/ Mosmof ( talk) 16:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
Image appears to be from this article published in 2006 (before upload on Wikipedia): https://www.depauw.edu/news/index.asp?id=18289 Mosmof ( talk) 16:41, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Icestorm815 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
08:44, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
The image is tagged as being under a Creative Commons attribution share-alike license, but the given source for the image, www.jennettemccurdy.com, gives no indication that material on the site is in the copyleft. 青い(Aoi) ( talk) 16:44, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
I doubt the rights of this image belong to the uploader. J Milburn ( talk) 17:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
Image claimed as PD-Pre78 - but source given as Flight International - (presumably here) which is and was not based in the United States - so the image (of a British Fighter Aircraft) is unlikely to have been first published in the United States Nigel Ish ( talk) 18:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Centrx (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
05:42, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
Publicly released isn't the same thing as "public domain." I think they may be incorrectly conflated in this case. ( ESkog)( Talk) 18:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
Image claimed as PD-Pre78 - but source given as Flight International - A British Magazine (image found here so is unlikely to have been FIRST published in the US as required by this tag. Nigel Ish ( talk) 18:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
Image claimed as PD-Pre78 - but source given as Flight International - A British Magazine ( image found here) so is unlikely to have been FIRST published in the US as required by this tag Nigel Ish ( talk) 18:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Stifle (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Image contains elements of copyrighted software. – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 21:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
An uncropped image found here, no evidence of public domain or free license. Mosmof ( talk) 23:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
This image was taken from Flickr, where it is "All rights reserved". See http://www.flickr.com/photos/kamran2171/2300681962/ Fences and windows ( talk) 02:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
There is no source for the image given on the web page it was uploaded from, and I doubt very much that this is a contemporary portrait as stated. It looks modern to me. Wikipedia should not state that this is a contemporary likeness unless it can be shown that it is. RobertG ♬ talk 07:51, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Graeme Bartlett (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
08:44, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
This is a photo by Tim Dominick of The State here. 66.57.188.49 ( talk) 09:23, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Closedmouth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
08:59, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
Image is by Juan Blas from the Daily Gamecock here. Uploader does not claim to be Juan Blas nor does uploader credit Juan Blas. Ripping off a kid who works at a school newspaper is disgusting and shameful. 66.57.188.49 ( talk) 09:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
Other military-related uploads from this user were copyright violations. The lack of metadata on this one, as well as the similarity in subject matter, leads me to believe this one is too - but I can't find the original source, so listing here instead of speedying. ( ESkog)( Talk) 12:46, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
User claims to have taken picture themselves, but image is thumbnail sized and available at http://www.ramadhan.u-net.com/images/noor_msq.jpg. Otterathome ( talk) 13:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
Image is thumbnail sized and appears to be a duplicate violation, likely taken from ramadhan.u-net.com, see Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2009_May_19#File:Noor_msq-1-.jpg Otterathome ( talk) 13:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
EVula (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
15:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
Contains a copyrighted element from After Dark. Note that the uploader mistakenly claims free use in the history [1], when parody would only be a justification for fair use. Also note that this image is found only outside of article space. the wub "?!" 13:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
EVula (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
15:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
Similar to Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 May 19#File:Flyingtoaster star.gif, contains elements from the copyrighted software After Dark. the wub "?!" 13:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
Uploader has several copyvios; can't find the original source on this one but suspect it is as well. ( ESkog)( Talk) 15:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
The image appears in this property management website: http://www.amerimar.com/detaildisplay.php?id=19 Not certain if it's the original work of the uploader. Mosmof ( talk) 16:24, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
There is no evidence that the author has died over 70 years. Vinhtantran ( talk) 16:25, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
File is marked "all rights reserved" on Flickr, and the original Flickr info was mysterious removed since the initial upload: http://www.flickr.com/photos/40804010@N00/945117880/ Mosmof ( talk) 16:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
Image appears to be from this article published in 2006 (before upload on Wikipedia): https://www.depauw.edu/news/index.asp?id=18289 Mosmof ( talk) 16:41, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Icestorm815 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
08:44, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
The image is tagged as being under a Creative Commons attribution share-alike license, but the given source for the image, www.jennettemccurdy.com, gives no indication that material on the site is in the copyleft. 青い(Aoi) ( talk) 16:44, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
I doubt the rights of this image belong to the uploader. J Milburn ( talk) 17:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
Image claimed as PD-Pre78 - but source given as Flight International - (presumably here) which is and was not based in the United States - so the image (of a British Fighter Aircraft) is unlikely to have been first published in the United States Nigel Ish ( talk) 18:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Centrx (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
05:42, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
Publicly released isn't the same thing as "public domain." I think they may be incorrectly conflated in this case. ( ESkog)( Talk) 18:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
Image claimed as PD-Pre78 - but source given as Flight International - A British Magazine (image found here so is unlikely to have been FIRST published in the US as required by this tag. Nigel Ish ( talk) 18:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
Image claimed as PD-Pre78 - but source given as Flight International - A British Magazine ( image found here) so is unlikely to have been FIRST published in the US as required by this tag Nigel Ish ( talk) 18:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Stifle (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Image contains elements of copyrighted software. – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 21:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Drilnoth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
03:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
An uncropped image found here, no evidence of public domain or free license. Mosmof ( talk) 23:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply