The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Blatant copyvio of [1], if that is unavailable, [2] is a derivative. —  neuro ^{(talk) (review)} 02:52, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Tagged as freely licensed but with a non-free rationale, may depict an object which is subject to copyright and/or replaceable Stifle ( talk) 11:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Uploader has a history of uploading copyrighted non-free art and claiming free use (trying various license statements to see which will allow this). It is simply not believable they took this. The legalistically blurred participants (other than the subject) suggest this is taken from yet another dominatrix site, without permission. / edg ☺ ☭ 12:46, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of this debate was: Keep. - Andrew c  ^[talk] 00:07, 8 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Site given as source doesn't seem to exist, so CC claim cannot be verified. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 13:33, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Free image. Putting the given author name in quotes & the source domain minus .tld into Google returned correctly-spelt source straightaway; user had just missed off ".uk" on end of the source link. This took me all of ten seconds.

The image is verifiably CC-licensed. I corrected the cited license version (common issue), and added further source info., like date.

ESkog, you've commented on the uploader's talk page with a final block advisory, warning against their continuing unlawful (uploading) activity. Of course they should proofread, and sure the direct image link'd probably be nice, but if their other uploads included the same newbie mistake then apologizing and sharing some howto tips may be worth considering. – Whitehorse1 20:01, 29 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by WereSpielChequers ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:35, 23 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Blatantly contains copyrighted logo. —  neuro ^{(talk) (review)} 15:56, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

opposing that was generated by another place and give the user access to download the content and reupload for there own use proof [3] try it for your self when you genrate it look for To save this icon..

Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me Guestbook Hate Comments} 16:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

That doesn't make it free. —  neuro ^{(talk) (review)} 16:40, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Source states "All rights reserved". —  neuro ^{(talk) (review)} 16:39, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Well, I put it here specifically at the request of Jon Abbey at Erstwhile Records (the photo is taken by his wife Yuko). -- ND ( talk) 02:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: tagged {{ npd}}. – Quadell ^{( talk)} 14:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Source states "All rights reserved". —  neuro ^{(talk) (review)} 16:39, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

I put the photo there at Jon Abbey's request (it's taken by his wife Yuko), who in turn was relaying Keith Rowe's own request, as he doesn't like the photo of him performing with Doerner very much. -- ND ( talk) 02:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Screenshot of an episode of Skins, which is a copyrighted television program. —  neuro ^{(talk) (review)} 17:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Freedom of panorama only applies to buildings in the US. Rockfang ( talk) 20:07, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Freedom of panorama only applies to buildings in the US. Rockfang ( talk) 20:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Freedom of panorama only applies to buildings in the US. Rockfang ( talk) 20:11, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not deleted, free image. – Quadell ^{( talk)} 14:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC) reply

geograph.org is just a domain squatter, so I can't find the actual source to verify that this image has been so released. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 22:05, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Free image. Same .org.uk issues apply as in earlier comment about same uploader. – Whitehorse1 16:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Cited source points to a non-existent web page; can't verify PD claim ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 22:06, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Author/title search on Google gives the source (ballynagarrick.net), which had been mis-spelt. With that said, I saw zero indication there (ballynagarrick.net/places/broughshane.htm) to verify it was PD. If freedom of panorama did apply to the image that'd be one thing; regardless it's not released by the author as public domain, as far as I can see. – Whitehorse1 20:28, 29 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Cited source points to a non-existent web page; can't verify PD claim ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 22:07, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Same comment ( diff) applies (unable to verify released as PD). – Whitehorse1 20:31, 29 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept, free image. – Quadell ^{( talk)} 14:53, 17 April 2009 (UTC) reply

geograph.org is the cited source; it's just a domain squatter, can't verify claim of license ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 22:18, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Free image. Same .org.uk issues apply as in earlier comment about same uploader. – Whitehorse1 16:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.