The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Small image size and lack of data makes it likely this image was taken from a website. Polly ( Parrot) 00:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
A promotional hi res image, no evidence the uploader is the copyright holder. Polly ( Parrot) 00:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Source listed states - All content Copyright the Kabir Project 2003-2009 Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:18, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Derivate work of commercial product. Maybe resolution could be decreased and a fair use rationale could be written. User:Nillerdk ( talk) 13:11, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep, now has fair-use rationale. – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 02:40, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Derived from non-free image Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep, de minimis. – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 03:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Seeming fair use claim - but tagged PD self - Does FOP apply to offical insignia? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:27, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
I took this photo myself back 2008. Free use, no copyright violation as it is in the public domain. Defiant15E ( talk) 09:36, July 10, 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Appears to be a photograph of another work. No indication the uploader owns the rights to the original image. J Milburn ( talk) 13:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep. – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 02:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Subject was only born just over a hundred years ago, and is middle aged in this image. Could not have been created by someone who died over 100 years ago. J Milburn ( talk) 13:57, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Looks like a corporate logo. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn ( talk) 15:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
This was taken fewer than 100 years ago, so there's no way the author can have been dead 100 years. J Milburn ( talk) 15:03, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
See - http://www.eternalwaterheater.com/terms-of-use/ Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:07, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Same reasons as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Technology05.jpg Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:10, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Screenshot of a webpage. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn ( talk) 17:56, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Web resolution shot, no meta-data. I suspect this image has been taken from elsewhere. J Milburn ( talk) 18:03, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. If the image accurately represents a coat of arms, then it is fair use. If the image was entirely self-made, then I can't see any real use of it on Wikipedia. – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 03:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
A coat of arms. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this file. J Milburn ( talk) 18:53, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Kept; de minimis/not passing threshold of originality. Stifle ( talk) 21:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Logo design? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Clearly a publicity shot, somehow I doubt the source website is the copyright holder. J Milburn ( talk) 19:12, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
J Milburn ( talk) 19:24, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
I doubt this is own work. It looks like a publicity shot- empty plain, low res, no meta-data, and the user was originally uploading similar photos as the work of someone else. J Milburn ( talk) 19:25, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: kept new version uploaded.
Skier Dude (
talk)
05:22, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
Artwork - No FOP in France
Sfan00 IMG (
talk)
19:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Not meta-data, came in a batch that look like publicity shots. J Milburn ( talk) 19:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Press conference picture- source is blog...No indication it's uploaders photo Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:33, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Screenshot - No Way is this self! Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:56, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploader/Author mismatch Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Not PD-Self if US army authored - which is also doubtful given the link
Sfan00 IMG (
talk)
20:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
Honestly, I have no clue what makes a free image which is why i let you guys decide. Username 1 ( talk) 20:41, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Author/Uploader mismatch - Not Self Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MBisanz ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:34, 18 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete: uploader cannot own the copyright of this movie poster which is an unused orphan image ww2censor ( talk) 23:11, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Small image size and lack of data makes it likely this image was taken from a website. Polly ( Parrot) 00:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
A promotional hi res image, no evidence the uploader is the copyright holder. Polly ( Parrot) 00:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Source listed states - All content Copyright the Kabir Project 2003-2009 Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:18, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Derivate work of commercial product. Maybe resolution could be decreased and a fair use rationale could be written. User:Nillerdk ( talk) 13:11, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep, now has fair-use rationale. – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 02:40, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Derived from non-free image Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep, de minimis. – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 03:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Seeming fair use claim - but tagged PD self - Does FOP apply to offical insignia? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:27, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
I took this photo myself back 2008. Free use, no copyright violation as it is in the public domain. Defiant15E ( talk) 09:36, July 10, 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Appears to be a photograph of another work. No indication the uploader owns the rights to the original image. J Milburn ( talk) 13:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep. – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 02:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Subject was only born just over a hundred years ago, and is middle aged in this image. Could not have been created by someone who died over 100 years ago. J Milburn ( talk) 13:57, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Looks like a corporate logo. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn ( talk) 15:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
This was taken fewer than 100 years ago, so there's no way the author can have been dead 100 years. J Milburn ( talk) 15:03, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
See - http://www.eternalwaterheater.com/terms-of-use/ Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:07, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Same reasons as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Technology05.jpg Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:10, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Screenshot of a webpage. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn ( talk) 17:56, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Web resolution shot, no meta-data. I suspect this image has been taken from elsewhere. J Milburn ( talk) 18:03, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. If the image accurately represents a coat of arms, then it is fair use. If the image was entirely self-made, then I can't see any real use of it on Wikipedia. – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 03:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
A coat of arms. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this file. J Milburn ( talk) 18:53, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Kept; de minimis/not passing threshold of originality. Stifle ( talk) 21:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Logo design? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Clearly a publicity shot, somehow I doubt the source website is the copyright holder. J Milburn ( talk) 19:12, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
J Milburn ( talk) 19:24, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
I doubt this is own work. It looks like a publicity shot- empty plain, low res, no meta-data, and the user was originally uploading similar photos as the work of someone else. J Milburn ( talk) 19:25, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: kept new version uploaded.
Skier Dude (
talk)
05:22, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
Artwork - No FOP in France
Sfan00 IMG (
talk)
19:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Not meta-data, came in a batch that look like publicity shots. J Milburn ( talk) 19:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Press conference picture- source is blog...No indication it's uploaders photo Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:33, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Screenshot - No Way is this self! Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:56, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploader/Author mismatch Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Not PD-Self if US army authored - which is also doubtful given the link
Sfan00 IMG (
talk)
20:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
Honestly, I have no clue what makes a free image which is why i let you guys decide. Username 1 ( talk) 20:41, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Author/Uploader mismatch - Not Self Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MBisanz ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:34, 18 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete: uploader cannot own the copyright of this movie poster which is an unused orphan image ww2censor ( talk) 23:11, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply