- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: template updated to {{ PD-ineligible}} Skier Dude ( talk) 06:08, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The uploader claims that this is original work but the image is identical to one appearing at [1]; this site appears to be the work of Paul Kunkel. RDBury ( talk) 02:42, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- I don't think this is really copyrightable. It is a diagram illustrating a simple geometric concept and is {{
PD-ineligible}}.
IronGargoyle (
talk)
13:02, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Good point, but if that is the case then copyright status needs to be changed. In any case the information on the file description page is incorrect.-- RDBury ( talk) 13:55, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Not own work. Also not US Federal Government work if issued after 1977. Sv1xv ( talk) 11:14, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Delete: this is a 1981 US stamp so is copyright and as such fails WP:NFC#Images. ww2censor ( talk) 04:14, 2 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploader states Copyright status of this image has been renewed to conform with Wikipedia rules on image description page. I don't even really know what this means, except that the image is still probably copyrighted by the original creator, and not the uploader. ( ESkog)( Talk) 13:35, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Jezball - Screenshot - What licence was original program? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:23, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploader states it's "from his VHS collection" - unlikely that uploader holds the copyright to this image. ( ESkog)( Talk) 15:32, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: updated template to {{
PD-Pre1978}}
Skier Dude (
talk)
06:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
Programme cover - Skeptical about 'self' claim
Sfan00 IMG (
talk)
16:05, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- The program (see the entries below) was published without a copyright notice prior to 1978. As such, it is in the public domain per {{ PD-Pre1978}}. IronGargoyle ( talk) 20:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: updated template to {{
PD-Pre1978}}
Skier Dude (
talk)
06:13, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
Programme scan - Skeptical it was made by uploader
Sfan00 IMG (
talk)
16:06, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- See my comment above. IronGargoyle ( talk) 20:31, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: updated template to {{
PD-Pre1978}}
Skier Dude (
talk)
06:13, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
Programme - Skeptical it was created by uploader Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:07, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- See my comment above. IronGargoyle ( talk) 20:31, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: updated template to {{
PD-Pre1978}}
Skier Dude (
talk)
06:13, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
Programme - Skeptical it was created by the uploader
Sfan00 IMG (
talk)
16:07, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- See my comment above. IronGargoyle ( talk) 20:31, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Says "AP Wirephoto" in the image - Thus skeptical about the self claim Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:14, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:07, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Images lists permission as Creative Commons; however, source ( http://lindsaypollock.com/about/) lists image as copyrighted ttonyb1 ( talk) 16:24, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted. The artworks, and not the show, are the primary subjects of the image. Had some bystanders, or stands, or cash register, or whatever appeared in the photograph, a claim could be made out that the image was of the show.
The matter of freedom of panorama doesn't come into play, because the photo was taken in the USA, where FOP is for buildings only. Stifle ( talk) 11:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Artwork inclusion - No indication artwork is public domain or under 'free' licence Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 18:13, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The image does not duplicate or reproduce an artwork. It depicts a show of artwork. There is no copyright violation. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 18:18, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Sloppy nomination, certainly no copyvio. Jeni ( talk)(Jenuk1985) 23:22, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Can you explain further? My understanding was FOP did NOT apply to 2D artwork? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The description suggests that the uploader is the person depicted in the photograph, but the copyright holder of the photograph is the photographer unless copyright has been transferred somehow. So either a permission should be sent in to OTRS, or the image should be deleted. Stifle ( talk) 20:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Response: I am Andrew Demcak, I took this picture of myself and I own the rights to it. I give permission to Wikipedia to use this image. 71.139.165.14 ( talk) 14:47, 31 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ad1968 ( talk • contribs) 14:55, 30 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- You need to follow the procedure at WP:IOWN. Stifle ( talk) 15:01, 2 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Promotional image, no evidence uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 21:19, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Looks like a television screenshot, dubious sourcing. J Milburn ( talk) 21:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Promotional image, no evidence uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 21:42, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Book cover artwork, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 22:35, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Book cover artwork, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 22:35, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Book cover artwork, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 22:39, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Book cover artwork, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 22:39, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Book cover artwork, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 22:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website:Small size and no metadata. Polly ( Parrot) 22:43, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Book cover artwork, uploader unlikely to hold copyright Polly ( Parrot) 22:50, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
This is a character from a notable comic strip. The copyright holder in this case would most likely be the publisher or the author. I honestly doubt the uploader is the copyright owner. FASTILY (TALK) 22:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
This is a character from a notable comic strip. The copyright holder in this case would most likely be the publisher or the author. I honestly doubt the uploader is the copyright owner. FASTILY (TALK) 23:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Copyrighted by Getty Images: see [2] -- Midgrid (talk) 23:26, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Copyrighted by Getty Images: see [3]. -- Midgrid (talk) 23:31, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Copyrighted by the European Pressphoto Agency: see [4] for an example. -- Midgrid (talk) 23:42, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Copyrighted by Getty Images: see [5]. -- Midgrid (talk) 23:47, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: template updated to {{ PD-ineligible}} Skier Dude ( talk) 06:08, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The uploader claims that this is original work but the image is identical to one appearing at [1]; this site appears to be the work of Paul Kunkel. RDBury ( talk) 02:42, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- I don't think this is really copyrightable. It is a diagram illustrating a simple geometric concept and is {{
PD-ineligible}}.
IronGargoyle (
talk)
13:02, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Good point, but if that is the case then copyright status needs to be changed. In any case the information on the file description page is incorrect.-- RDBury ( talk) 13:55, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Not own work. Also not US Federal Government work if issued after 1977. Sv1xv ( talk) 11:14, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Delete: this is a 1981 US stamp so is copyright and as such fails WP:NFC#Images. ww2censor ( talk) 04:14, 2 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploader states Copyright status of this image has been renewed to conform with Wikipedia rules on image description page. I don't even really know what this means, except that the image is still probably copyrighted by the original creator, and not the uploader. ( ESkog)( Talk) 13:35, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Jezball - Screenshot - What licence was original program? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:23, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploader states it's "from his VHS collection" - unlikely that uploader holds the copyright to this image. ( ESkog)( Talk) 15:32, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: updated template to {{
PD-Pre1978}}
Skier Dude (
talk)
06:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
Programme cover - Skeptical about 'self' claim
Sfan00 IMG (
talk)
16:05, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- The program (see the entries below) was published without a copyright notice prior to 1978. As such, it is in the public domain per {{ PD-Pre1978}}. IronGargoyle ( talk) 20:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: updated template to {{
PD-Pre1978}}
Skier Dude (
talk)
06:13, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
Programme scan - Skeptical it was made by uploader
Sfan00 IMG (
talk)
16:06, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- See my comment above. IronGargoyle ( talk) 20:31, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: updated template to {{
PD-Pre1978}}
Skier Dude (
talk)
06:13, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
Programme - Skeptical it was created by uploader Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:07, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- See my comment above. IronGargoyle ( talk) 20:31, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: updated template to {{
PD-Pre1978}}
Skier Dude (
talk)
06:13, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
Programme - Skeptical it was created by the uploader
Sfan00 IMG (
talk)
16:07, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- See my comment above. IronGargoyle ( talk) 20:31, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Says "AP Wirephoto" in the image - Thus skeptical about the self claim Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:14, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:07, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Images lists permission as Creative Commons; however, source ( http://lindsaypollock.com/about/) lists image as copyrighted ttonyb1 ( talk) 16:24, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted. The artworks, and not the show, are the primary subjects of the image. Had some bystanders, or stands, or cash register, or whatever appeared in the photograph, a claim could be made out that the image was of the show.
The matter of freedom of panorama doesn't come into play, because the photo was taken in the USA, where FOP is for buildings only. Stifle ( talk) 11:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Artwork inclusion - No indication artwork is public domain or under 'free' licence Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 18:13, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The image does not duplicate or reproduce an artwork. It depicts a show of artwork. There is no copyright violation. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 18:18, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Sloppy nomination, certainly no copyvio. Jeni ( talk)(Jenuk1985) 23:22, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Can you explain further? My understanding was FOP did NOT apply to 2D artwork? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The description suggests that the uploader is the person depicted in the photograph, but the copyright holder of the photograph is the photographer unless copyright has been transferred somehow. So either a permission should be sent in to OTRS, or the image should be deleted. Stifle ( talk) 20:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Response: I am Andrew Demcak, I took this picture of myself and I own the rights to it. I give permission to Wikipedia to use this image. 71.139.165.14 ( talk) 14:47, 31 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ad1968 ( talk • contribs) 14:55, 30 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- You need to follow the procedure at WP:IOWN. Stifle ( talk) 15:01, 2 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Promotional image, no evidence uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 21:19, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Looks like a television screenshot, dubious sourcing. J Milburn ( talk) 21:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Promotional image, no evidence uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 21:42, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Book cover artwork, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 22:35, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Book cover artwork, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 22:35, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Book cover artwork, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 22:39, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Book cover artwork, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 22:39, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Book cover artwork, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 22:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website:Small size and no metadata. Polly ( Parrot) 22:43, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Book cover artwork, uploader unlikely to hold copyright Polly ( Parrot) 22:50, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
This is a character from a notable comic strip. The copyright holder in this case would most likely be the publisher or the author. I honestly doubt the uploader is the copyright owner. FASTILY (TALK) 22:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
This is a character from a notable comic strip. The copyright holder in this case would most likely be the publisher or the author. I honestly doubt the uploader is the copyright owner. FASTILY (TALK) 23:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Copyrighted by Getty Images: see [2] -- Midgrid (talk) 23:26, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Copyrighted by Getty Images: see [3]. -- Midgrid (talk) 23:31, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Copyrighted by the European Pressphoto Agency: see [4] for an example. -- Midgrid (talk) 23:42, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Copyrighted by Getty Images: see [5]. -- Midgrid (talk) 23:47, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.