- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploader does not hold the copyright of the stamp artwork. Polly ( Parrot) 00:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete: there is no evidence that Korean stamps are copyright free per commons:Commons:Stamps/Public domain templates. Beside which a 2006 stamp is too new and would fail the 70-year rule. It certainly cannot be used as a non-free image in the current article as it would fail WP:NFC#Images #3 because it is being used for decoration or to identify the subject of the stamp without any mention or critical commentary in the prose. ww2censor ( talk) 17:08, 4 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Likely sourced from a website, small size and no meta data. Polly ( Parrot) 00:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Likely sourced from a website, small image size and no meta data. Polly ( Parrot) 00:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website. Polly ( Parrot) 00:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Book cover artwork, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 00:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Screenshot of a website, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 00:54, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep w/license as updated.
Skier Dude (
talk)
04:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
No evidence this image is public domain.
Polly (
Parrot)
00:55, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- I thought works by the government (in this case the air force) were public material.
Enryū6473
Talk
04:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- I understand that Polly is questioning whether it is an Air Force photo, given that it's taken from planetgadget.com.
Stifle (
talk)
09:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Ah, well I see that. Here is another place ( http://g2globalsolutions.com/review/?p=1364) that says it is a photo by General Atomics (they got the picture from Aviation Week). Since General Atomics is contracted to the Air Force, does that still count, or can I put the copyright as a promotional material, or do I have to put something else? Enryū6473 Talk 19:24, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- I understand that Polly is questioning whether it is an Air Force photo, given that it's taken from planetgadget.com.
Stifle (
talk)
09:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- I changed the license to non-free promotional since it is a promotional work by a company. I hope that resolves any copyright issues. Enryū6473 Talk 22:16, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: kept w/ license as updated.
Skier Dude (
talk)
04:45, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
Screenshot of a commercial website, uploader unlikely to hold copyright.
Polly (
Parrot)
00:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
Well, I made this screenshot myself. Is there a problem with publishing screenshots of websites/software made by oneself? George585 ( George585) 12:44, 15 July 2009 (GMT+3)
- You put that you were the copyright holder, aka you owned the website. I'll change it to the right one for you. Enryū6473 Talk 22:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: kept w/license as updated.
Skier Dude (
talk)
04:47, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
Image likely sourced from a website, no evidence the uploader holds copyright.
Polly (
Parrot)
01:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- ok, this is obviously a promotional picture of a building, so the promotional template should apply. Enryū6473 Talk 22:23, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website, small size & no meta data. Polly ( Parrot) 01:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Given its appearance image is likely sourced from a website. Polly ( Parrot) 01:07, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Also promotional, so I'll redo that. Though I dont know the source. Anyone know? If not I'll look a it harder. Enryū6473 Talk 22:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image sourced from a website, no evidence uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 01:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- potentially promosional, since it came from the Institute for Research and Archiving of Music, but from looking at the website it is not a reliable source (aka, I don't think they did it). The picture should be deleted. Enryū6473 Talk 22:46, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:29, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply
I highly doubt that the uploader took all of these images. – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 01:44, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- looks like a poastcard, so template:non-free card? Enryū6473 Talk 23:02, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
dfu}} or list it at
WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept.
AnomieBOT
⚡
10:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Note' from closing admin: Not a postcard. The images have been rearranged in different revisions. Deleted accordingly. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:56, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Ruslik0 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 01:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nja247 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website: Small size & no metadata. Polly ( Parrot) 01:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nja247 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
An obviously promotional image, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 01:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nja247 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website: small size and no metadata. Polly ( Parrot) 01:55, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
This needs a source for all of the images in it to ensure that the copyright status is correct. I doubt that the uploader took all of these. S/he also uploaded it at lv:Attēls:Rigas mozaika.png, but that appears to have even less source info. – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 02:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
.jpg){kind=link}
Image seems to have been randomly taken from a website; uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder. Stifle ( talk) 09:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
.jpg){kind=link}
This image is not free. It was taken from another site from someone who does not own the photograph. It has been up for quite a while since it has been disputed, it should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.56.237 ( talk) 05:58, 2 August 2009 (UTC) reply
.jpg){kind=link}
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image is taken from Flickr where it is tagged with a Creative commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 Generic which is not free for commercial use. Whpq ( talk) 11:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept; PD in Canada as published before 1949, and PD in the USA as published abroad before 1923. Stifle ( talk) 10:19, 15 September 2009 (UTC) reply
More explicit source/author information required to verify the creator of this image died more than 100 years ago. J Milburn ( talk) 15:32, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- That's not what is necessary for it to be pd-canada. Protonk ( talk) 18:12, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the
listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "Image_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at
WT:PUF or at my talk page.
AnomieBOT
⚡
21:06, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
reason Diclements ( talk) 16:07, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Please note that this image falls within 'public domain' with regards to Canadian copyright law. All photographic images created prior to 1949 come under public domain. This image was apparently created for George Weston's 1911 election campaign for Toronto alderman. The physical artifact, namely the photographic print, is in the custody of the Weston Corporate Archives, George Weston Limited, Toronto. There is no further source information, such as a photogrphers stamp, anywhere on the artifact.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website: small size no metdata, no evidence the uploader hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 16:10, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Looks like the same image in this portfolio site. Sorry for the Flash, but check the Portfolio, then find NIIT in the alphabetical listing. The caption in this portfolio is identical to the caption posted with the image in the NIIT article. The user who uploaded this has been indefinitely blocked for refusing to discuss copyright issues. WeisheitSuchen ( talk) 11:52, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete: this is most certainly the identical image to the one that WeisheitSuchen found. Well spotted. A clear copyright violation. ww2censor ( talk) 14:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Dougweller ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Image sourced from here, no evidence uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 16:12, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Dougweller ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Image sourced from here no evidence uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 16:12, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Dougweller ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:15, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website:Small size & lack of metadata. Polly ( Parrot) 16:14, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Seems like a commercial artwork of an artist, no evidence uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 17:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Stifle (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA) A file with this name on
Commons is now visible.
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:06, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
PD-Poland demands the date of first publishing and that the publishing was done without a copyright notice. No evidence is given to this effect. We do not know where this photo was taken, by who (Penderecki is a well-travelled man), or where and when it was published (if ever). Jappalang ( talk) 17:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The photographer of the work has released it into the public domain. I don't see what the problem is here. Further the image is not here but at the commons, I'm not sure if this is the place to discuss this photo. Singingdaisies ( talk) 01:10, 9 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image sourced from a website, no evidence uploader is the copyright holder. Polly ( Parrot) 17:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Also File:ItchenorChurch.jpg. Both probable copyvios from here. Uploader has a history of copyright violations; there is no evidence that uploader is the photographer. — mholland (talk) 18:34, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Looks like it was sourced from a commercial website, given the writing on the image. No evidence uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 19:56, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete: a smaller version of this same image is here and the company's privacy policy page clearly asserts their copyright. ww2censor ( talk) 14:27, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Comment the uploader User:Evpope does seem to be associated with the company, per the source information on File:Large lizard wall.jpg, also a Scott Systems Inc image, and the company contact page. They do seem to want to give permission for use per the File:Large lizard wall.jpg info but have not followed the OTRS procedure. Perhaps someone should contact them to get permission if the rest of this uploader's images are considered useful. This comment applies equally to the image listed below. ww2censor ( talk) 14:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Looks like it was sourced from a commercial website, given the writing on the image. No evidence uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 19:59, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete: while I can't find this particular image in the Scott Systems portfolio pages many similar image are seen there that are all copyright. ww2censor ( talk) 14:35, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Response from uploader (evpope): I am the marketing person at Scott System and uploaded the file (ScottSystemShoreline.jpg) from our Scott System server. I have permission from the company to release these images on Wikipedia. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Evpope (
talk •
contribs)
20:15, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Album cover artwork uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 20:01, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep: the album cover is being used in an article about that album, so the licencing needs to be changed and a fair-use rationale provided, the it will be fine.
ww2censor (
talk)
14:17, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Delete it has been removed from the article by the uploader, so it is now orphaned image of a non-free album cover. ww2censor ( talk) 17:11, 4 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:32, 17 July 2009 (UTC) reply
According to [1], this picture belongs to the UN. I am not tagging this for speedy, as I believe that this image helps to demonstrate that concern is warranted for some other images by this contributor, which I am about to incorporate into this listing below. Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:10, 15 July 2009 (UTC) Others by this contributor for which I believe review is necessary: reply
![[2]](http://www.na.gov.pk/p_release_images/spk_mardan.jpg){kind=link}
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image is sourced from a website, no evidence the uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 20:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image is a screenshot of a music video, uploader very unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 20:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Delete. Screenshot from the music video for the single "Koi Aanay Wala Hai". — Satori Son 18:51, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: File does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website:Small size and no metadata. Polly ( Parrot) 22:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stephen ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Image almost certainly sourced from a website:Small size and no metadata. Polly ( Parrot) 22:21, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stephen ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Image almost certainly sourced from a website or scanned from a book. Small size and lack of metadata. Polly ( Parrot) 22:23, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
.jpg){kind=link}
Image looks like a screenshot or sourced from a website. Uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 23:23, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete. Appears to be screenshot from MTV broadcast. No description or metadata. — Satori Son 18:39, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
.jpg){kind=link}
An obviously promotional image, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 23:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
.jpg){kind=link}
- See [4] for a copy of the photo on the MTV Germany's site. -- Whpq ( talk) 03:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website:Small size and no metadata. Polly ( Parrot) 23:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website:Small size and no metadata. Polly ( Parrot) 23:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploader does not hold the copyright of the stamp artwork. Polly ( Parrot) 00:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete: there is no evidence that Korean stamps are copyright free per commons:Commons:Stamps/Public domain templates. Beside which a 2006 stamp is too new and would fail the 70-year rule. It certainly cannot be used as a non-free image in the current article as it would fail WP:NFC#Images #3 because it is being used for decoration or to identify the subject of the stamp without any mention or critical commentary in the prose. ww2censor ( talk) 17:08, 4 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Likely sourced from a website, small size and no meta data. Polly ( Parrot) 00:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Likely sourced from a website, small image size and no meta data. Polly ( Parrot) 00:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website. Polly ( Parrot) 00:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Book cover artwork, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 00:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Screenshot of a website, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 00:54, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep w/license as updated.
Skier Dude (
talk)
04:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
No evidence this image is public domain.
Polly (
Parrot)
00:55, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- I thought works by the government (in this case the air force) were public material.
Enryū6473
Talk
04:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- I understand that Polly is questioning whether it is an Air Force photo, given that it's taken from planetgadget.com.
Stifle (
talk)
09:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Ah, well I see that. Here is another place ( http://g2globalsolutions.com/review/?p=1364) that says it is a photo by General Atomics (they got the picture from Aviation Week). Since General Atomics is contracted to the Air Force, does that still count, or can I put the copyright as a promotional material, or do I have to put something else? Enryū6473 Talk 19:24, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- I understand that Polly is questioning whether it is an Air Force photo, given that it's taken from planetgadget.com.
Stifle (
talk)
09:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- I changed the license to non-free promotional since it is a promotional work by a company. I hope that resolves any copyright issues. Enryū6473 Talk 22:16, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: kept w/ license as updated.
Skier Dude (
talk)
04:45, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
Screenshot of a commercial website, uploader unlikely to hold copyright.
Polly (
Parrot)
00:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
Well, I made this screenshot myself. Is there a problem with publishing screenshots of websites/software made by oneself? George585 ( George585) 12:44, 15 July 2009 (GMT+3)
- You put that you were the copyright holder, aka you owned the website. I'll change it to the right one for you. Enryū6473 Talk 22:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: kept w/license as updated.
Skier Dude (
talk)
04:47, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
Image likely sourced from a website, no evidence the uploader holds copyright.
Polly (
Parrot)
01:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- ok, this is obviously a promotional picture of a building, so the promotional template should apply. Enryū6473 Talk 22:23, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website, small size & no meta data. Polly ( Parrot) 01:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Given its appearance image is likely sourced from a website. Polly ( Parrot) 01:07, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Also promotional, so I'll redo that. Though I dont know the source. Anyone know? If not I'll look a it harder. Enryū6473 Talk 22:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image sourced from a website, no evidence uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 01:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- potentially promosional, since it came from the Institute for Research and Archiving of Music, but from looking at the website it is not a reliable source (aka, I don't think they did it). The picture should be deleted. Enryū6473 Talk 22:46, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:29, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply
I highly doubt that the uploader took all of these images. – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 01:44, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- looks like a poastcard, so template:non-free card? Enryū6473 Talk 23:02, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
dfu}} or list it at
WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept.
AnomieBOT
⚡
10:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Note' from closing admin: Not a postcard. The images have been rearranged in different revisions. Deleted accordingly. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:56, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Ruslik0 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 01:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nja247 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website: Small size & no metadata. Polly ( Parrot) 01:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nja247 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
An obviously promotional image, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 01:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nja247 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website: small size and no metadata. Polly ( Parrot) 01:55, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
This needs a source for all of the images in it to ensure that the copyright status is correct. I doubt that the uploader took all of these. S/he also uploaded it at lv:Attēls:Rigas mozaika.png, but that appears to have even less source info. – Drilnoth ( T • C • L) 02:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image seems to have been randomly taken from a website; uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder. Stifle ( talk) 09:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
This image is not free. It was taken from another site from someone who does not own the photograph. It has been up for quite a while since it has been disputed, it should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.56.237 ( talk) 05:58, 2 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image is taken from Flickr where it is tagged with a Creative commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 Generic which is not free for commercial use. Whpq ( talk) 11:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept; PD in Canada as published before 1949, and PD in the USA as published abroad before 1923. Stifle ( talk) 10:19, 15 September 2009 (UTC) reply
More explicit source/author information required to verify the creator of this image died more than 100 years ago. J Milburn ( talk) 15:32, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- That's not what is necessary for it to be pd-canada. Protonk ( talk) 18:12, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the
listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "Image_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at
WT:PUF or at my talk page.
AnomieBOT
⚡
21:06, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
reason Diclements ( talk) 16:07, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Please note that this image falls within 'public domain' with regards to Canadian copyright law. All photographic images created prior to 1949 come under public domain. This image was apparently created for George Weston's 1911 election campaign for Toronto alderman. The physical artifact, namely the photographic print, is in the custody of the Weston Corporate Archives, George Weston Limited, Toronto. There is no further source information, such as a photogrphers stamp, anywhere on the artifact.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website: small size no metdata, no evidence the uploader hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 16:10, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Looks like the same image in this portfolio site. Sorry for the Flash, but check the Portfolio, then find NIIT in the alphabetical listing. The caption in this portfolio is identical to the caption posted with the image in the NIIT article. The user who uploaded this has been indefinitely blocked for refusing to discuss copyright issues. WeisheitSuchen ( talk) 11:52, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete: this is most certainly the identical image to the one that WeisheitSuchen found. Well spotted. A clear copyright violation. ww2censor ( talk) 14:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Dougweller ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Image sourced from here, no evidence uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 16:12, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Dougweller ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Image sourced from here no evidence uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 16:12, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Dougweller ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:15, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website:Small size & lack of metadata. Polly ( Parrot) 16:14, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Seems like a commercial artwork of an artist, no evidence uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 17:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Stifle (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA) A file with this name on
Commons is now visible.
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:06, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
PD-Poland demands the date of first publishing and that the publishing was done without a copyright notice. No evidence is given to this effect. We do not know where this photo was taken, by who (Penderecki is a well-travelled man), or where and when it was published (if ever). Jappalang ( talk) 17:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The photographer of the work has released it into the public domain. I don't see what the problem is here. Further the image is not here but at the commons, I'm not sure if this is the place to discuss this photo. Singingdaisies ( talk) 01:10, 9 October 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image sourced from a website, no evidence uploader is the copyright holder. Polly ( Parrot) 17:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Also File:ItchenorChurch.jpg. Both probable copyvios from here. Uploader has a history of copyright violations; there is no evidence that uploader is the photographer. — mholland (talk) 18:34, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Looks like it was sourced from a commercial website, given the writing on the image. No evidence uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 19:56, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete: a smaller version of this same image is here and the company's privacy policy page clearly asserts their copyright. ww2censor ( talk) 14:27, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Comment the uploader User:Evpope does seem to be associated with the company, per the source information on File:Large lizard wall.jpg, also a Scott Systems Inc image, and the company contact page. They do seem to want to give permission for use per the File:Large lizard wall.jpg info but have not followed the OTRS procedure. Perhaps someone should contact them to get permission if the rest of this uploader's images are considered useful. This comment applies equally to the image listed below. ww2censor ( talk) 14:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Looks like it was sourced from a commercial website, given the writing on the image. No evidence uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 19:59, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete: while I can't find this particular image in the Scott Systems portfolio pages many similar image are seen there that are all copyright. ww2censor ( talk) 14:35, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Response from uploader (evpope): I am the marketing person at Scott System and uploaded the file (ScottSystemShoreline.jpg) from our Scott System server. I have permission from the company to release these images on Wikipedia. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Evpope (
talk •
contribs)
20:15, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Album cover artwork uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 20:01, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep: the album cover is being used in an article about that album, so the licencing needs to be changed and a fair-use rationale provided, the it will be fine.
ww2censor (
talk)
14:17, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Delete it has been removed from the article by the uploader, so it is now orphaned image of a non-free album cover. ww2censor ( talk) 17:11, 4 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:32, 17 July 2009 (UTC) reply
According to [1], this picture belongs to the UN. I am not tagging this for speedy, as I believe that this image helps to demonstrate that concern is warranted for some other images by this contributor, which I am about to incorporate into this listing below. Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:10, 15 July 2009 (UTC) Others by this contributor for which I believe review is necessary: reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image is sourced from a website, no evidence the uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 20:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image is a screenshot of a music video, uploader very unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 20:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Delete. Screenshot from the music video for the single "Koi Aanay Wala Hai". — Satori Son 18:51, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: File does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website:Small size and no metadata. Polly ( Parrot) 22:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stephen ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Image almost certainly sourced from a website:Small size and no metadata. Polly ( Parrot) 22:21, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stephen ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Image almost certainly sourced from a website or scanned from a book. Small size and lack of metadata. Polly ( Parrot) 22:23, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image looks like a screenshot or sourced from a website. Uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 23:23, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- Delete. Appears to be screenshot from MTV broadcast. No description or metadata. — Satori Son 18:39, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
An obviously promotional image, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 23:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- See [4] for a copy of the photo on the MTV Germany's site. -- Whpq ( talk) 03:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website:Small size and no metadata. Polly ( Parrot) 23:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image likely sourced from a website:Small size and no metadata. Polly ( Parrot) 23:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.