August 23
File:Downtown La Crosse skyline.JPG
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Source URL: http://www.lacrossekiwanis.org/ ( image file)
This page is with copyright description as "Copyright © 2007 La Crosse Kiwanis Club. All Rights Reserved". It is obvious that this image is copyrighted, not released into public domain by the author as the uploader claims. Yassie ( talk) 02:14, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:2004 6 grant achatz.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC) reply
A promotional picture of the individual, likely that the uploader does not hold the copyright of the image. — Σ xplicit 06:47, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:American.karate.men.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The uploader noted that someone who owns "an original copy" of the photograph gave permission, but this does not imply that that person holds copyright on the image. Since the image was from Wikimedia Commons, I tried editing the image's page there, but the templates I tried did not seem to work properly. Thanks. Janggeom ( talk) 10:10, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Statehouse-1-.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Claimed to be PD as a publication of the government of Sierra Leone. The source website does have a copyright notice, though. B ( talk) 14:43, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:JuliusGibrillaWoobay.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
No evidence of permission, no statement of permission on source website B ( talk) 14:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Obi metzger 08-1-.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
No evidence of permission, no statement of permission readily apparent on source website. B ( talk) 14:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Ibrahim Tahini Khalil-1-.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
No evidence of permission, no statement of permission readily apparent on source website. B ( talk) 14:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:PatrickBantamoi.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
No evidence of permission, no statement of permission readily apparent on source website. B ( talk) 14:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:AhmedDean.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
No evidence of permission, no statement of permission readily apparent on source website. B ( talk) 14:46, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- Cert non-free. Fansfc.com have got this from the club and user has no right to use on Wiki-- 86.148.168.116 ( talk) 08:36, 5 September 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Samuelbarlay.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
No evidence of permission, no statement of permission readily apparent on source website. B ( talk) 14:46, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:SalieuBundu.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
No evidence of permission, no statement of permission readily apparent on source website. B ( talk) 14:46, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:PaulKpaka.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
No evidence of permission, no statement of permission readily apparent on source website. B ( talk) 14:46, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
==== File:Carol duboc wiki 4 (2).jpg ====Craig is her freeloading husband. Uploader is not the photographer, no proof of ownership of copyright. Who then was a gentleman? ( talk) 18:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Although it's still in question and probably should be backed up with OTRS, but tineye
shows no other version of it. Keeping in mind tineye doesn't have much of the internet indexed. —
raeky (
talk |
edits) 03:12, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
- The File page names the photographer, there is no claim that the photographer is the uploader.
Who then was a gentleman? (
talk) 18:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
- If i recall, before the page was deleted, he signed his final comment on the page asking us not to delete it as Craig. Quite possibly he is the photographer, but OTRS would be needed, likewise if that page does come back it needs to be less in a far less direct copied from another site form.. —
raeky (
talk |
edits) 00:31, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
- User:Carol777 is claiming to be Craig Higdon? Not Carol Duboc? Who then was a gentleman? ( talk) 18:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- If i recall, before the page was deleted, he signed his final comment on the page asking us not to delete it as Craig. Quite possibly he is the photographer, but OTRS would be needed, likewise if that page does come back it needs to be less in a far less direct copied from another site form.. —
raeky (
talk |
edits) 00:31, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
- The File page names the photographer, there is no claim that the photographer is the uploader.
Who then was a gentleman? (
talk) 18:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Although it's still in question and probably should be backed up with OTRS, but tineye
shows no other version of it. Keeping in mind tineye doesn't have much of the internet indexed. —
raeky (
talk |
edits) 03:12, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:IMobile simulator-1.0.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Orphaned and I wonder if the Blackberry part could be a copyrighted software issue. Ricky81682 ( talk) 23:14, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:IMobile simulator-Alpha 1.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Orphaned and I wonder if the Blackberry part could be a copyrighted software issue. Ricky81682 ( talk) 23:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:IMobile simulator-Beta 3c.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Orphaned and I wonder if the Blackberry part could be a copyrighted software issue. Ricky81682 ( talk) 23:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:ImranKhan.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
From the logo at the bottom, I think Inminds would have the copyright. Ricky81682 ( talk) 23:20, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
August 23
File:Downtown La Crosse skyline.JPG
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Source URL: http://www.lacrossekiwanis.org/ ( image file)
This page is with copyright description as "Copyright © 2007 La Crosse Kiwanis Club. All Rights Reserved". It is obvious that this image is copyrighted, not released into public domain by the author as the uploader claims. Yassie ( talk) 02:14, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:2004 6 grant achatz.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC) reply
A promotional picture of the individual, likely that the uploader does not hold the copyright of the image. — Σ xplicit 06:47, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:American.karate.men.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The uploader noted that someone who owns "an original copy" of the photograph gave permission, but this does not imply that that person holds copyright on the image. Since the image was from Wikimedia Commons, I tried editing the image's page there, but the templates I tried did not seem to work properly. Thanks. Janggeom ( talk) 10:10, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Statehouse-1-.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Claimed to be PD as a publication of the government of Sierra Leone. The source website does have a copyright notice, though. B ( talk) 14:43, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:JuliusGibrillaWoobay.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
No evidence of permission, no statement of permission on source website B ( talk) 14:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Obi metzger 08-1-.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
No evidence of permission, no statement of permission readily apparent on source website. B ( talk) 14:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Ibrahim Tahini Khalil-1-.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
No evidence of permission, no statement of permission readily apparent on source website. B ( talk) 14:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:PatrickBantamoi.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
No evidence of permission, no statement of permission readily apparent on source website. B ( talk) 14:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:AhmedDean.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
No evidence of permission, no statement of permission readily apparent on source website. B ( talk) 14:46, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- Cert non-free. Fansfc.com have got this from the club and user has no right to use on Wiki-- 86.148.168.116 ( talk) 08:36, 5 September 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Samuelbarlay.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
No evidence of permission, no statement of permission readily apparent on source website. B ( talk) 14:46, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:SalieuBundu.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
No evidence of permission, no statement of permission readily apparent on source website. B ( talk) 14:46, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:PaulKpaka.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
No evidence of permission, no statement of permission readily apparent on source website. B ( talk) 14:46, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
==== File:Carol duboc wiki 4 (2).jpg ====Craig is her freeloading husband. Uploader is not the photographer, no proof of ownership of copyright. Who then was a gentleman? ( talk) 18:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- Although it's still in question and probably should be backed up with OTRS, but tineye
shows no other version of it. Keeping in mind tineye doesn't have much of the internet indexed. —
raeky (
talk |
edits) 03:12, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
- The File page names the photographer, there is no claim that the photographer is the uploader.
Who then was a gentleman? (
talk) 18:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
- If i recall, before the page was deleted, he signed his final comment on the page asking us not to delete it as Craig. Quite possibly he is the photographer, but OTRS would be needed, likewise if that page does come back it needs to be less in a far less direct copied from another site form.. —
raeky (
talk |
edits) 00:31, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
- User:Carol777 is claiming to be Craig Higdon? Not Carol Duboc? Who then was a gentleman? ( talk) 18:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- If i recall, before the page was deleted, he signed his final comment on the page asking us not to delete it as Craig. Quite possibly he is the photographer, but OTRS would be needed, likewise if that page does come back it needs to be less in a far less direct copied from another site form.. —
raeky (
talk |
edits) 00:31, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
- The File page names the photographer, there is no claim that the photographer is the uploader.
Who then was a gentleman? (
talk) 18:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Although it's still in question and probably should be backed up with OTRS, but tineye
shows no other version of it. Keeping in mind tineye doesn't have much of the internet indexed. —
raeky (
talk |
edits) 03:12, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:IMobile simulator-1.0.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Orphaned and I wonder if the Blackberry part could be a copyrighted software issue. Ricky81682 ( talk) 23:14, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:IMobile simulator-Alpha 1.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Orphaned and I wonder if the Blackberry part could be a copyrighted software issue. Ricky81682 ( talk) 23:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:IMobile simulator-Beta 3c.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Orphaned and I wonder if the Blackberry part could be a copyrighted software issue. Ricky81682 ( talk) 23:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:ImranKhan.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
From the logo at the bottom, I think Inminds would have the copyright. Ricky81682 ( talk) 23:20, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.