The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Image appears at http://www.roosevelt.nl/smartsite.dws?ch=RSC&id=1034. No evidence of a GFDL license. fuzzy510 ( talk) 02:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Just confused here. Image is tagged as both being in the public domain and being fair-use. One is wrong, obviously. fuzzy510 ( talk) 03:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
no source given for the 4 base photos used herein Skier Dude ( talk) 04:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Skier Dude ( talk) 04:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle ( talk) 14:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle ( talk) 14:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Stifle ( talk) 14:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle ( talk) 14:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle ( talk) 14:23, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Here the photo is claimed to be made by Reuters. I was unable to find the original Reuters photo, but still seems to be copyvio. Blacklake ( talk) 15:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
This link http://encarta.msn.com/media_461536702_761581480_-1_1/Alexander_Butterfield.html on the encarta web site from where this image was downloaded seems to indicate that this image is the property of the Corbis Bettman archive. There is no indication that this image was taken by employee of the Executive Office of the President of the United States. Captain-tucker ( talk) 16:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
orphaned, appears to be professional headshot, no source Skier Dude ( talk) 18:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
No indication of release of (c) at source Skier Dude ( talk) 19:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
no indication of release of (c) at source Skier Dude ( talk) 19:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Image appears to be copied from http://www.mehsa.org/images/DLogieL.jpg and although the uploader claims to be the copyright holder, that's not likely to be true based on other copyright violations. Whpq ( talk) 19:48, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Image is copied from http://www.mehsa.org/images/MEHSbldgL.jpg and according to http://www.mehsa.org/MEHSbldgL.htm, the image is courtesy of Kyaw Thinn, so unless User:Sky89 is this person, they are not the copyright holder. Based on contribution history, this is very unlikely. Whpq ( talk) 19:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Logo for the Toronto Dance Theatre; no evidence of any permission to publish under Creative Commons. fuzzy510 ( talk) 20:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
An IP expressed the following concern: BMW is not a German court. I assume the IP does not know about PUF, so I am vouching here even though I think the IP doesn't understand what this document is. Ipatrol ( talk) 21:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
orphaned, no reason to believe this was released under GNU Skier Dude ( talk) 22:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
orphaned, highly doubt that uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 22:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
orphaned logo, doubtful uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:02, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
orphaned logo, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Image appears at http://www.roosevelt.nl/smartsite.dws?ch=RSC&id=1034. No evidence of a GFDL license. fuzzy510 ( talk) 02:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Just confused here. Image is tagged as both being in the public domain and being fair-use. One is wrong, obviously. fuzzy510 ( talk) 03:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
no source given for the 4 base photos used herein Skier Dude ( talk) 04:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Skier Dude ( talk) 04:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle ( talk) 14:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle ( talk) 14:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Stifle ( talk) 14:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle ( talk) 14:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle ( talk) 14:23, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Here the photo is claimed to be made by Reuters. I was unable to find the original Reuters photo, but still seems to be copyvio. Blacklake ( talk) 15:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
This link http://encarta.msn.com/media_461536702_761581480_-1_1/Alexander_Butterfield.html on the encarta web site from where this image was downloaded seems to indicate that this image is the property of the Corbis Bettman archive. There is no indication that this image was taken by employee of the Executive Office of the President of the United States. Captain-tucker ( talk) 16:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
orphaned, appears to be professional headshot, no source Skier Dude ( talk) 18:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
No indication of release of (c) at source Skier Dude ( talk) 19:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
no indication of release of (c) at source Skier Dude ( talk) 19:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Image appears to be copied from http://www.mehsa.org/images/DLogieL.jpg and although the uploader claims to be the copyright holder, that's not likely to be true based on other copyright violations. Whpq ( talk) 19:48, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Image is copied from http://www.mehsa.org/images/MEHSbldgL.jpg and according to http://www.mehsa.org/MEHSbldgL.htm, the image is courtesy of Kyaw Thinn, so unless User:Sky89 is this person, they are not the copyright holder. Based on contribution history, this is very unlikely. Whpq ( talk) 19:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Logo for the Toronto Dance Theatre; no evidence of any permission to publish under Creative Commons. fuzzy510 ( talk) 20:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
An IP expressed the following concern: BMW is not a German court. I assume the IP does not know about PUF, so I am vouching here even though I think the IP doesn't understand what this document is. Ipatrol ( talk) 21:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
orphaned, no reason to believe this was released under GNU Skier Dude ( talk) 22:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
orphaned, highly doubt that uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 22:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
orphaned logo, doubtful uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:02, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
orphaned logo, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply