The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Image appears at http://www.roosevelt.nl/smartsite.dws?ch=RSC&id=1034. No evidence of a GFDL license. fuzzy510 ( talk) 02:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Free image, not deleted.. – Quadell ^{( talk)} 14:27, 29 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Just confused here. Image is tagged as both being in the public domain and being fair-use. One is wrong, obviously. fuzzy510 ( talk) 03:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

It's in the public domain and it is also used as a logo for the Ancient Monuments Society; because I used the word "logo" in the description, a bot then tagged it as a logo. I have now removed all mentions of logo so hopefully that won't happen again. SilkTork * ^YES! 07:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

no source given for the 4 base photos used herein Skier Dude ( talk) 04:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Skier Dude ( talk) 04:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle ( talk) 14:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle ( talk) 14:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Stifle ( talk) 14:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle ( talk) 14:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle ( talk) 14:23, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Here the photo is claimed to be made by Reuters. I was unable to find the original Reuters photo, but still seems to be copyvio. Blacklake ( talk) 15:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

This link http://encarta.msn.com/media_461536702_761581480_-1_1/Alexander_Butterfield.html on the encarta web site from where this image was downloaded seems to indicate that this image is the property of the Corbis Bettman archive. There is no indication that this image was taken by employee of the Executive Office of the President of the United States. Captain-tucker ( talk) 16:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

orphaned, appears to be professional headshot, no source Skier Dude ( talk) 18:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

No indication of release of (c) at source Skier Dude ( talk) 19:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

no indication of release of (c) at source Skier Dude ( talk) 19:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Adding the following by the same uploader for the same reason: File:IVF ICSI.jpg File:Microsurgical vasovasostomy.jpg File:Vasovasostomy Layer Diagram.jpg Skier Dude ( talk) 19:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Image appears to be copied from http://www.mehsa.org/images/DLogieL.jpg and although the uploader claims to be the copyright holder, that's not likely to be true based on other copyright violations. Whpq ( talk) 19:48, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Image is copied from http://www.mehsa.org/images/MEHSbldgL.jpg and according to http://www.mehsa.org/MEHSbldgL.htm, the image is courtesy of Kyaw Thinn, so unless User:Sky89 is this person, they are not the copyright holder. Based on contribution history, this is very unlikely. Whpq ( talk) 19:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Logo for the Toronto Dance Theatre; no evidence of any permission to publish under Creative Commons. fuzzy510 ( talk) 20:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: License fixed, kept. – Quadell ^{( talk)} 14:33, 29 April 2009 (UTC) reply

An IP expressed the following concern: BMW is not a German court. I assume the IP does not know about PUF, so I am vouching here even though I think the IP doesn't understand what this document is. Ipatrol ( talk) 21:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

It's {{ PD-US-1923-abroad}} in any case. Stifle ( talk) 10:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Agreed. Clearly in the public domain per {{ PD-US-1923-abroad}}. IronGargoyle ( talk) 17:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

orphaned, no reason to believe this was released under GNU Skier Dude ( talk) 22:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

orphaned, highly doubt that uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 22:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

orphaned logo, doubtful uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:02, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

orphaned logo, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 23:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.