The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

too small to be 100% sure, but it appears that there is a (c) watermark in the lower left-hand corner Skier Dude ( talk) 00:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

There does indeed seem to be a watermark there. If the uploader cannot explain this in some way, I agree that the image should be deleted. Awadewit ( talk) 03:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

appears to be screencap from film, uploader not (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 02:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

I agree with Skier Dude that this appears to be a frame from a film and that the uploader is not the copyright holder. As such, it should have a FUR. I'm not sure what article this image should be in, so I cannot even contact the appropriate editors. We should therefore delete it. Awadewit ( talk) 03:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: 'Keep for now but tag with {{ di-no source}}. – Drilnoth ( T •  C •  L) 01:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC) reply

orphaned, no source, if legit logo, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 02:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Per WP:LOGO, this image cannot be copyrighted because the logo is purely typeface. It can be trademarked, however. Awadewit ( talk) 03:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

series of game screenshots for Roma Victor, all incorrectly licensed PD - including File:Rv13.jpg ‎ File:Rv13.jpg ‎ File:Rv11.jpg File:Rv8.jpg ‎ File:Rv9.jpg File:Rv7.jpg File:Rv5.jpg ‎ File:Rv3.jpg ‎ File:Rv4.jpg ‎ File:Rv2.jpg File:Rv1a.jpg ‎ Skier Dude ( talk) 03:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

I've left a note at the Talk:Roma Victor#Non-free images. Perhaps one of the editors there will help add some FURs. If that does not happen, these should definitely be deleted as the copyright is owned by the software company. Awadewit ( talk) 04:06, 16 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

If it's a photography of the box front, wouldn't the publisher ( Lindberg Models) own the copyright to that, since it isn't in the public domain? As such, it would be a non-free image which isn't appropriate as used at 1:64 scale. Ricky81682 ( talk) 06:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

I agree that the copyright is owned by the publisher. The editors at that article should at least be given a chance to write a FUR, however. I've left a note at Talk:1:64 scale#Non-free image. If a FUR is not forthcoming, the image should be deleted. Awadewit ( talk) 04:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Screenshot of a commercial website. I doubt this has been released under a free license. J Milburn ( talk) 10:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

This image is copyrighted by the Schway corporation (see website). As it is feasible that a shot of the company's website might be justified on the company's article, I've left a note at Talk:Schway regarding the use of fair use images and encouraging the editors to add a FUR. Without the addition of a FUR, however, this image should be deleted. Awadewit ( talk) 04:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Album cover. Almost certainly not released under a free license. J Milburn ( talk) 11:04, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Agreed - few album covers are. Moreover, the website from which this was downloaded claims a copyright over the entire site for Zavoloka. This should be deleted. Awadewit ( talk) 04:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Album cover. Almost certainly not released under a free license. J Milburn ( talk) 11:04, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Agreed - few album covers are. Moreover, the website from which this was downloaded claims a copyright over the entire site for Zavoloka. This should be deleted. Awadewit ( talk) 04:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Album cover. Almost certainly not released under a free license. J Milburn ( talk) 11:05, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

orphaned, low quality, if legit logo, uploader would not likely be (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 17:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep per AnomieBOT; free licenses removed, kept as fair use and tagged with {{ di-no source}}. – Drilnoth ( T •  C •  L) 01:44, 27 April 2009 (UTC) reply

multiple conflicting licenses; highly doubt CC2.5 is correct Skier Dude ( talk) 17:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

orphaned, appears to be scan of book, not a photo Skier Dude ( talk) 17:26, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

given pixelation & blur (left side), appears to be scan of book or newpaper article, not of picture Skier Dude ( talk) 17:27, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

given odd size of image & artifacts, appears to be book scan Skier Dude ( talk) 17:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

clearly scan of book & not a picture Skier Dude ( talk) 17:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Wizardman ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC) reply

scan of professionally-distributed football cards, not photos Skier Dude ( talk) 17:33, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

appears to be a yearbook or similar scan, not a photo Skier Dude ( talk) 17:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

given image artifacts & odd top border, appears to be scan of newspaper or similar source Skier Dude ( talk) 19:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

from pixelation & odd top border, appears to be scan of yearbook or other similar source Skier Dude ( talk) 19:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

from pixelation/crosshatching, appears to be scan of yearbook or other similar source Skier Dude ( talk) 19:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

no source provided, appears to be official headshot Skier Dude ( talk) 19:53, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

no source, from background appears to be official headshot Skier Dude ( talk) 19:59, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.