The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by PeterSymonds ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:48, 2 April 2009 (UTC) reply
An IP has stated that the image is not for commercial use, which could mean that the IP actually holds the copyright and has published it under an invalid license, or it could just be vandalism. Ipatrol ( talk) 00:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The only thing you can do is to scrap the image and release it again under a license that allows commercial use (we won't accept it otherwise). I will have it deleted as per F3 now, just reload a new version under CC-BY-SA.-- Ipatrol ( talk) 22:25, 2 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Probably non-free image claimed as public domain. Commercial image of copyrighted product design and logo. kotra ( talk) 00:53, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Skier Dude (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
05:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
reply
Blatant screenshot of copyrighted software/map. — neuro (talk) (review) 06:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Skier Dude (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
05:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
reply
Blatant screenshot of copyrighted software/map. — neuro (talk) (review) 06:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Although the screenshot would come under fair-use, this image was published in a magazine as well – does that not affect the fair use policy? If so, I can easily upload a fair-use replacement. Cycle~ ( talk) 12:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply
No source provided Tomdobb ( talk) 13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply
No source provided Tomdobb ( talk) 13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply
No source provided Tomdobb ( talk) 13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply
No source provided Tomdobb ( talk) 13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply
No source provided Tomdobb ( talk) 13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply
No source provided Tomdobb ( talk) 13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Skier Dude (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
05:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
reply
Copyrighted DVD cover, unlikely uploader is copyright holder. — neuro (talk) (review) 17:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Copyrighted logo, highly unlikely uploader is copyright holder. — neuro (talk) (review) 18:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Skier Dude (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
05:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
reply
Contains multiple unfree logos. — neuro (talk) (review) 19:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Geni ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC) reply
This signature is a derivative work which was created before this image was uploaded, likely copyvio. — neuro (talk) (review) 21:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 4 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Watermarked, no CC/GFDL at watermark source. — neuro (talk) (review) 21:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Skier Dude (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
05:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
reply
Watermarked, likely unfree. — neuro (talk) (review) 22:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by PeterSymonds ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:48, 2 April 2009 (UTC) reply
An IP has stated that the image is not for commercial use, which could mean that the IP actually holds the copyright and has published it under an invalid license, or it could just be vandalism. Ipatrol ( talk) 00:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The only thing you can do is to scrap the image and release it again under a license that allows commercial use (we won't accept it otherwise). I will have it deleted as per F3 now, just reload a new version under CC-BY-SA.-- Ipatrol ( talk) 22:25, 2 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Probably non-free image claimed as public domain. Commercial image of copyrighted product design and logo. kotra ( talk) 00:53, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Skier Dude (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
05:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
reply
Blatant screenshot of copyrighted software/map. — neuro (talk) (review) 06:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Skier Dude (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
05:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
reply
Blatant screenshot of copyrighted software/map. — neuro (talk) (review) 06:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Although the screenshot would come under fair-use, this image was published in a magazine as well – does that not affect the fair use policy? If so, I can easily upload a fair-use replacement. Cycle~ ( talk) 12:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply
No source provided Tomdobb ( talk) 13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply
No source provided Tomdobb ( talk) 13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply
No source provided Tomdobb ( talk) 13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply
No source provided Tomdobb ( talk) 13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply
No source provided Tomdobb ( talk) 13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply
No source provided Tomdobb ( talk) 13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Skier Dude (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
05:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
reply
Copyrighted DVD cover, unlikely uploader is copyright holder. — neuro (talk) (review) 17:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Copyrighted logo, highly unlikely uploader is copyright holder. — neuro (talk) (review) 18:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Skier Dude (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
05:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
reply
Contains multiple unfree logos. — neuro (talk) (review) 19:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Geni ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC) reply
This signature is a derivative work which was created before this image was uploaded, likely copyvio. — neuro (talk) (review) 21:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 4 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Watermarked, no CC/GFDL at watermark source. — neuro (talk) (review) 21:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Skier Dude (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
05:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
reply
Watermarked, likely unfree. — neuro (talk) (review) 22:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply