The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I3 by
Gwen Gale (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
derivative work. Rettetast ( talk) 01:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I9 by
Gwen Gale (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Image not found at given source...photos by that Flickr uploader are licensed as "all rights reserved". Kelly hi! 01:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I5 by
Skier Dude (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA) A file with this name on
Commons is now visible.
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
reason this image is non-free Littlegiant22 ( talk) 02:26, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I3 by
Gwen Gale (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA) A file with this name on
Commons is now visible.
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
No proof that this image has been released into the public domain by owner. Described as being "distributed for use for publicity matters" — 59.189.42.56 ( talk) 02:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC). reply
The result of the discussion was: kept with amended license Skier Dude ( talk) 01:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Item is claimed as free under Section 62 (the UK freedom of panorama clause). However, that applies to "works of artistic craftsmanship", not "graphic works" such as murals or paintings. See this section of the FOP explanation at Commons. The item should be tagged with {{ Non-free 2D art}} and have a fair use rationale. Kelly hi! 07:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I9 by
Gwen Gale (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Obviously non-free image of licensed, copyrighted character; uploader falsely claiming it as their own work -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 12:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I9 by
Gwen Gale (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
no evidence of public domain Rettetast ( talk) 15:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I9 by
Gwen Gale (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Unable to determine whether these images were released into the public domain. Kelly hi! 20:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I3 by
Gwen Gale (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
derivative work. Rettetast ( talk) 01:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I9 by
Gwen Gale (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Image not found at given source...photos by that Flickr uploader are licensed as "all rights reserved". Kelly hi! 01:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I5 by
Skier Dude (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA) A file with this name on
Commons is now visible.
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
reason this image is non-free Littlegiant22 ( talk) 02:26, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I3 by
Gwen Gale (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA) A file with this name on
Commons is now visible.
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
No proof that this image has been released into the public domain by owner. Described as being "distributed for use for publicity matters" — 59.189.42.56 ( talk) 02:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC). reply
The result of the discussion was: kept with amended license Skier Dude ( talk) 01:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Item is claimed as free under Section 62 (the UK freedom of panorama clause). However, that applies to "works of artistic craftsmanship", not "graphic works" such as murals or paintings. See this section of the FOP explanation at Commons. The item should be tagged with {{ Non-free 2D art}} and have a fair use rationale. Kelly hi! 07:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I9 by
Gwen Gale (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Obviously non-free image of licensed, copyrighted character; uploader falsely claiming it as their own work -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 12:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I9 by
Gwen Gale (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
no evidence of public domain Rettetast ( talk) 15:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I9 by
Gwen Gale (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Unable to determine whether these images were released into the public domain. Kelly hi! 20:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply