The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Bibliomaniac15 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Promo photo uploader unlikely to hold copyright Polly ( Parrot) 00:49, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Doug ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Image is claimed to be PD, however on the source I can see no mention of anything stating it is public domain. It's also used on People Magazine's website. Save-Me-Oprah ^(talk) 01:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G5 by NrDg ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

according to the image description, the uploader must be asked for the permission to use the image in conflict with the CC/GFDL license. bluemask ^{( talk)} 02:41, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

If that is so, the uploader obviously does not realize the meaning of the CC/GFDL license. Starczamora ( talk) 13:30, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

User also uploaded Image:Angel Dubai2.jpg with same issue. -- Geniac ( talk) 14:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by NrDg ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

duplicate of an image also at PUI bluemask ^{( talk)} 02:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I6 by SatyrTN ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Summary says it is a press picture so uploader is not the copyright holder as claimed. Nv8200p talk 03:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Copyright dubious as work was published in what is claimed a 1960's book. Furthermore, I am not sure the users are being faithful to the caption or if the image is really from this obscure book! I could not find more images of this picture from any other work. And, do not have the work to check it, and these users have thus far refused to properly scan whole page. 149.68.31.146 ( talk) 22:15, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

This image is reportedly over 100 years old, it's from painting in 19th century by V. V. Vereschagin (1842–1904) appearing in a more recent book. Prior attempt to remove it was made by banned User:Artaxiad, so the IP account attempt to do the same is suspicious, as pointed out by Atabek at Image talk:Noble-shushavian1.jpg.

The uploader has been contacted to identify the book, and should be contacted again if more information is required. John Vandenberg ( talk) 06:14, 27 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Judging from your mentality, then it should have been as suspicious if I opened an account. What an unbiased and competent administrator. If the image was painted in 1800's it does not mean it was published back then. There is a difference between creating and publication. If I chiseled a rock 100 years ago and photographed/published it 10 years ago, there is a slight difference. The copyvio is clearly violated. I also asked for a clear scan of the whole page to make sure it is indeed even from the book they claim and this was the original caption - and where do we go - if I am a banned user or not - nice to get off point! Dear biased and incompetent admin, seriously, either ban me or put the issue of me being a banned user back into your mouth. 149.68.31.146 ( talk) 14:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above IP is a sock of banned user, please see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Erkusukes. Grandmaster ( talk) 08:21, 29 March 2008 (UTC) reply

actually, it said i am not erkesukes, and the question of image remains. 149.68.31.146 ( talk) 19:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Yes, you are User:Azad chai/ User:Azerbaboon. Please leave, you are banned from editing this site. Grandmaster ( talk) 19:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Dear Fariz Ismailzade, please find your place in world and do not tell people what to do. I like reading you articles on jamestown, but unfortunately, this site, Wikipedia is not a place for you or your propoganda, so, yes LLLEEEAAVVVEEE! 149.68.31.146 ( talk) 04:11, 30 March 2008 (UTC) reply

I have no idea who Ismailzade is, but I know that you are a banned user and you are not allowed to edit this site. I hope the admins will deal with this ban evasion. Grandmaster ( talk) 04:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted- FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The entirety of the user's image uploads appear to be off web copyvios from a variety of sources mostly Sinodefence and GlobalSecurity.org. I have attempted to talk to the user, but the account appears to have gone dead. Would suggest deleting the lot. Example: Image:Chinese Dongfeng Missile railway transport.jpg from [1] notice the cropping. Megapixie ( talk) 05:50, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Flickr source is cc-by-nc-sa, file is orphaned Nilf anion ( talk) 11:18, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Flickr source is cc-by-nc-nd, so unfree. Nilf anion ( talk) 11:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Sherool ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File from Flickr, all rights reserved there. WP and Flickr users are apparently different people. Nilf anion ( talk) 11:25, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Flickr source is cc-by-nc-sa, so unfree. Nilf anion ( talk) 11:26, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

From Flickr, all rights reserved there. Nilf anion ( talk) 11:30, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Flickr source is cc-by-nc-sa, so unfree. Nilf anion ( talk) 11:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Flickr source is cc-by-nc-sa, so unfree. File orphaned. Nilf anion ( talk) 11:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

This image was cc-by-sa, but was changed to cc-by-nc-sa sometime after Feb 25, 2008. However, I do not object to deleting because the image is not being used. -- Beefyt ( talk) 23:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Flickr photo is private, but Flickr user tags all public files with "all rights reserved". File is orphaned here. Nilf anion ( talk) 11:38, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

From Flickr, source is all rights reserved. Nilf anion ( talk) 11:39, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

From Flickr, source is cc-by-nc-sa. Nilf anion ( talk) 11:41, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

From Flickr, all rights reserved there. File is orphaned. Nilf anion ( talk) 11:43, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

No reason given for NRR claim, WSU claim © on their site Stannered ( talk) 12:02, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I1 by Brianga ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

See: http://disney.go.com/corporate/legal/terms.html No evidence of CC-BY-SA release Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

No evidence of CC-BY-SA release Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:09, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by NrDg ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Photo claims to be self-made, but was actually taken from Philippine Entertainment Portal website, as seen in the image's watermark like this one. — Starczamora ( talk) 13:49, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia's logo is *NOT* free, it can't be mixed with a free image. This image can be replaced with another full-free image O s a m a K 15:50, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I, as the author, don't really want this image kept, so you can delete it if you want. bruce89 ( talk) 20:41, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Claims own work, but looke like a promo photo. Notice the license plate. Liftarn ( talk) 19:36, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Looks like a promo isn't much to go on. Perhaps it is a promo photo and the uploader took it, or perhaps it's just a hobby photo. Display cars often have brand plates, and brand plates are added in post production to car photos as well. 220.233.94.208 ( talk) 12:47, 13 April 2008 (UTC) (I am user rav0) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

No evidence it's free. Unused. Liftarn ( talk) 19:40, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Uploader blanked self-licensing unexplained. Jusjih ( talk) 22:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The source site does not show any copyright licensing. Jusjih ( talk) 22:55, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Questionable public domain claim Jusjih ( talk) 23:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

This is the first page of RTC's Articles of Incorporation. It is part of the Church of Scientology International's application for tax-exempt status (501(c)(3) Non-Profit Corporation). After the tax-exempt status has been granted in 1993, all the supporting documents by the CSI have been released by the IRA to the general public. This document and other documents were obtained at the IRS, more specifically at the IRS-office in Washington, DC in early 1999. They are consequently documents obtained from the U.S. government and in the public domain. Geo1967 ( talk) 00:54, 27 March 2008 (UTC) reply

I haven't heard anything back since I have replied on March 27. Was this explanation sufficient enough? Geo1967 ( talk) 11:35, 1 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Image kept. Is public domain as tagged. - Nv8200p talk 21:41, 9 May 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by East718 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Promo photo, no evidence the uploader holds copyright. Polly ( Parrot) 23:39, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

No evidence permission was granted to use image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 23:39, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.