The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
G4 by
IronGargoyle (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Reupload of an image deleted after a previous PUI listing. Given the uploader's image upload history, as well as the mismatch between the ExIF data and the uploader's claimed creation date, no evidence to believe the uploader owns the copyright to the image. Mosmof ( talk) 00:03, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I5 by
East718 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
No copyright information provided at source; no evidence of public domain-release. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 01:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Brandon (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Would this count as freedom of panorama or not, cause this is being specifically used to show the sign. — ViperSnake151 03:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Brandon (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
The originating Web site is dead, and I doubt they had the right in the first place. Good time to re-establish ownership. Adoniscik( t, c) 04:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Brandon (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Source (a commercial site) doesn't say who the author of this photo is. Kelly hi! 06:18, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I9 by
Brandon (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Unlikely that uploader is the copyright holder. Brianga ( talk) 12:13, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Brandon (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
The page listed as a source shows the image with a copyright notice on it. Pages above this image in that webspace don't show anything listing either GFDL or public domain which is asserted by the uploader. -- Slambo (Speak) 13:11, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Brandon (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
The page that is listed as a source does not make any mention of the image copyright, pages above it in that webspace imply that the images linked therein are not licensed as the uploader asserts. — Slambo (Speak) 13:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Brandon (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
No copyright details listed at all by the uploader; the two other images uploaded from the same login also have questionable copyright status. — Slambo (Speak) 13:16, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I9 by
Calliopejen1 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Probably a copyvio from somewhere. Original uploader has a track record of copyvios (see upload log here: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Log&user=Oliverdp2003 Can't prove it, but looks fishy. Megapixie ( talk) 14:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
G4 by
IronGargoyle (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Reupload of an image deleted after a previous PUI listing. Given the uploader's image upload history, as well as the mismatch between the ExIF data and the uploader's claimed creation date, no evidence to believe the uploader owns the copyright to the image. Mosmof ( talk) 00:03, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I5 by
East718 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
No copyright information provided at source; no evidence of public domain-release. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 01:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Brandon (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Would this count as freedom of panorama or not, cause this is being specifically used to show the sign. — ViperSnake151 03:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Brandon (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
The originating Web site is dead, and I doubt they had the right in the first place. Good time to re-establish ownership. Adoniscik( t, c) 04:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Brandon (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Source (a commercial site) doesn't say who the author of this photo is. Kelly hi! 06:18, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I9 by
Brandon (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Unlikely that uploader is the copyright holder. Brianga ( talk) 12:13, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Brandon (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
The page listed as a source shows the image with a copyright notice on it. Pages above this image in that webspace don't show anything listing either GFDL or public domain which is asserted by the uploader. -- Slambo (Speak) 13:11, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Brandon (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
The page that is listed as a source does not make any mention of the image copyright, pages above it in that webspace imply that the images linked therein are not licensed as the uploader asserts. — Slambo (Speak) 13:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Brandon (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
No copyright details listed at all by the uploader; the two other images uploaded from the same login also have questionable copyright status. — Slambo (Speak) 13:16, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I9 by
Calliopejen1 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Probably a copyvio from somewhere. Original uploader has a track record of copyvios (see upload log here: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Log&user=Oliverdp2003 Can't prove it, but looks fishy. Megapixie ( talk) 14:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply