Hi. I'm after possible improvements and ideas before I nominate this portal for featured status. Jhfireboy Talk 15:07, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Very sound portal
Not much wrong here.
I made a few mostly minor changes to the layout and removed some redlinks.
just a few more things.
Go ahead and put it up for feature review if you think its ready. They will find the other little things that need a change that I missed in my 10 minute check.
Well done Hossen27 ( talk) 02:13, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
A very nice portal, as Hossen27 says. There are a few things that may need some fiddling, though:
Keep up the good work! Kirill 02:56, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Well, as mentioned by Kirill & Hossen27, really good portal. However, there are a few minor things that I think could use some improvement.
Other than that, however, I think this thing's pretty much ready for Featured Portal nomination. Excellent work. Cheers! Cam ( Chat) 04:11, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Good work so far. The portal is looking good, I just a few comments:
Otherwise, the portal looks very good. Kyriakos ( talk) 07:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Very good portal. Only one problem and that is with the colouring. It is not very easy to read the first section. Can i suggest that you use something other than blue on green as the background. Great content though.
Gaia Octavia Agrippa
T |
C
20:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC) Done
Some good work here. Building a new portal is a lonely task. Much of what I'll suggest is intended to invite the casual reader to participate. I personally think that there's way too much background color showing (Selected picture, for example), but that's an artistic choice, and not by any means a deal killer. There are several issues that will come up during any promotion process and must be resolved in some way, if my recent experience at P:ACW is indicative. I'll also suggest you look at Portal:Norway (a newly featured portal maintained by User:Cirt, a frequent FP commenter) for examples of what is expected in that process.
I suspect there's more to do, but since you need many more sub-articles and pictures, remind me to look again after you've built those quantities up a bit. BusterD ( talk) 00:17, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Very nicely done.
My only complaint, one already noted by other editors, is the dark green background at the top provides low contrast and makes it hard to read. --
Alexf
42
11:59, 15 July 2008 (UTC) Done
Hi. I'm after possible improvements and ideas before I nominate this portal for featured status. Jhfireboy Talk 15:07, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Very sound portal
Not much wrong here.
I made a few mostly minor changes to the layout and removed some redlinks.
just a few more things.
Go ahead and put it up for feature review if you think its ready. They will find the other little things that need a change that I missed in my 10 minute check.
Well done Hossen27 ( talk) 02:13, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
A very nice portal, as Hossen27 says. There are a few things that may need some fiddling, though:
Keep up the good work! Kirill 02:56, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Well, as mentioned by Kirill & Hossen27, really good portal. However, there are a few minor things that I think could use some improvement.
Other than that, however, I think this thing's pretty much ready for Featured Portal nomination. Excellent work. Cheers! Cam ( Chat) 04:11, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Good work so far. The portal is looking good, I just a few comments:
Otherwise, the portal looks very good. Kyriakos ( talk) 07:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Very good portal. Only one problem and that is with the colouring. It is not very easy to read the first section. Can i suggest that you use something other than blue on green as the background. Great content though.
Gaia Octavia Agrippa
T |
C
20:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC) Done
Some good work here. Building a new portal is a lonely task. Much of what I'll suggest is intended to invite the casual reader to participate. I personally think that there's way too much background color showing (Selected picture, for example), but that's an artistic choice, and not by any means a deal killer. There are several issues that will come up during any promotion process and must be resolved in some way, if my recent experience at P:ACW is indicative. I'll also suggest you look at Portal:Norway (a newly featured portal maintained by User:Cirt, a frequent FP commenter) for examples of what is expected in that process.
I suspect there's more to do, but since you need many more sub-articles and pictures, remind me to look again after you've built those quantities up a bit. BusterD ( talk) 00:17, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Very nicely done.
My only complaint, one already noted by other editors, is the dark green background at the top provides low contrast and makes it hard to read. --
Alexf
42
11:59, 15 July 2008 (UTC) Done