I believe this jewellery image could be a potential Feature picture due to the high educational value and the subject's artistic value as well as a fine photography. However, it is not very sharp, and I only cropped it a little, so I know the noise on the background should be removed. It is obtained via OTRS, so its permission process is not finished yet. I also wonder it can be FP regardless of the said weakness. Caspian blue 00:15, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Articles this image appears in

Emerald, Gemstone, Jewellery, Pendant, Victoria and Albert Museum

Creator

by Jinho Jung at Flickr

Suggested by

Caspian blue 00:15, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Comments

• Possibly could be a FP, it would need some graphic artist work, there is a white artifact on the right side of the image. —  raeky ^{( talk |  edits)} 00:40, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
  • You mean the noise on the upper right? -- Caspian blue 02:44, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
    • If you view the full image there is a white artifact, i assume it wasn't fully cropped off on the right side, it needs cropped... I'll fix it, give me a minute. —  raeky ^{( talk |  edits)} 02:52, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
      • I've corrected the problem, there was a small stripe of 1 pixel wide white pixels along the lower left side of the image, not sure what it was an artifact from but I got rid of it. Now it's black all the way around. —  raeky ^{( talk |  edits)} 03:11, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
• Also note the OTRS ticket will have to be confirmed and valid before you nominate this for FP, since if that doesn't validate it will be deleted. —  raeky ^{( talk |  edits)} 02:54, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply

  Thank you for the advice.-- Caspian blue 03:00, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply

  • Wish I could convince more people to release images under free licenses, every time I try they ignore me or have some irrational fear of the "commercial use" clause. *sigh* Congrats on getting this wonderful image though. :D —  raeky ^{( talk |  edits)} 03:10, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Seconder