It is a high quality shot of an important location for our understanding of human history. I think it is good enough but would value another opinion.
Sabine's Sunbirdtalk 04:45, 19 February 2010 (UTC)reply
I think this should be nominated to FPC, very high encyclopedic value. Image quality is not as superb as I would have expected from the 5DII; the sky in particular looks grainy and soft. Possibly it has been overly post processed and I'm seeing jpeg artifacts. Also has a few dust spots that should be cloned out. Still a great find.
Fletcher (
talk) 22:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC)reply
A pretty strong highlight reduction has been performed by the look of it.
Noodle snacks (
talk) 02:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)reply
It is a high quality shot of an important location for our understanding of human history. I think it is good enough but would value another opinion.
Sabine's Sunbirdtalk 04:45, 19 February 2010 (UTC)reply
I think this should be nominated to FPC, very high encyclopedic value. Image quality is not as superb as I would have expected from the 5DII; the sky in particular looks grainy and soft. Possibly it has been overly post processed and I'm seeing jpeg artifacts. Also has a few dust spots that should be cloned out. Still a great find.
Fletcher (
talk) 22:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC)reply
A pretty strong highlight reduction has been performed by the look of it.
Noodle snacks (
talk) 02:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)reply