I would specifically be interested in comments on scale and cropping; this is very large image with great detail and I am struggling to decide which balance would be best, easily visible detail (cropping to a small area) or a greater sense of scale (full image with ~1mm field of view). - ZephyrisTalk21:48, 10 July 2010 (UTC)reply
I should have also said this is a stitched montage of 30 images (6x5) so keep an eye out for stitching artefacts. These are pretty impossible to avoid (the whole sample is undergoing
brownian motion) but it would be good to know about serious problems. - ZephyrisTalk21:54, 10 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Seconder
FPC adores "science-y" stuff like this, and I love how great the quality is for such a very large image and many people on FPC are strongly biased toward really big images. I don't think you'd meet with much resistance if you nominated this. --
I′d※<3※Ɵɲɛ (
talk)
00:53, 18 July 2010 (UTC)reply
I would specifically be interested in comments on scale and cropping; this is very large image with great detail and I am struggling to decide which balance would be best, easily visible detail (cropping to a small area) or a greater sense of scale (full image with ~1mm field of view). - ZephyrisTalk21:48, 10 July 2010 (UTC)reply
I should have also said this is a stitched montage of 30 images (6x5) so keep an eye out for stitching artefacts. These are pretty impossible to avoid (the whole sample is undergoing
brownian motion) but it would be good to know about serious problems. - ZephyrisTalk21:54, 10 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Seconder
FPC adores "science-y" stuff like this, and I love how great the quality is for such a very large image and many people on FPC are strongly biased toward really big images. I don't think you'd meet with much resistance if you nominated this. --
I′d※<3※Ɵɲɛ (
talk)
00:53, 18 July 2010 (UTC)reply