WWE Divas Championship

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

• A script has been used to generate a semi- automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for November 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
This is so that the article can be added to our current WWE champions FT as an audited article too short to be a GA or FL. For that to happen, it needs a peer review. All comments welcome. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 03:39, 24 November 2008 (UTC) reply

I know nothing really about FLs, but isn't this article also too short to be added to the FT? Really I don't understand. Anyway, the only problem I see is that it isn't out of universe. The ring names don't have their real names beside them, which should be for consistency. Kayfabe should also not be used since the article is really un-understable and could serve a problem.-- Will C 09:52, 25 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Well, lack of quality is never a reason to exclude a page from a FT. I'll add real names, but not to the table. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 17:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC) reply

• For the lead, I say try using some of the prose of List of WCW World Tag Team Champions, especially the prose about how title reigns were determined by scripted etc. in that way you can avoid using kayfabe. If you follow that, it should be good.-- TRU _CO 17:15, 26 November 2008 (UTC) reply