Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…

I feel this article has reached a good stage. I feel the article has reached B grade, for LGBT studies, also how the article stands on Gender studies if the article needs more work and if so what could improve the article?

Thanks, Pennine rambler ( talk) 20:18, 13 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• WP:LEAD says the article should be a standalone summary of the entire article's contents. The lede intro is therefore a bit too short right now. — Cirt ( talk) 20:10, 14 October 2014 (UTC) reply

thanks, I think it is to early for a peer review on reflection.-- Pennine rambler ( talk) 02:42, 15 October 2014 (UTC) reply

I think the article is a bit young for a peer review as well. I copyedited it a bit though to help with the effort.Esprit15d • talk • contribs 19:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply