Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to level up my article level. Please help!
Thanks, -PsiΨ ( talk) 02:48, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Finetooth comments: Peer review is meant for articles that are nearly ready for WP:GAN or WP:FAC rather than brand-new ones like this. Looking briefly at the article's talk page, I see that others have mentioned things that I might have mentioned, chiefly the article's dependence on a single source. Unless you can find other sources like newspaper articles that meet the guidelines at WP:RS, it will be hard to keep the article from being deleted. I think you would be wise to keep talking to other editors on the article's talk page to figure out how best to proceed. Finetooth ( talk) 06:56, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to level up my article level. Please help!
Thanks, -PsiΨ ( talk) 02:48, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Finetooth comments: Peer review is meant for articles that are nearly ready for WP:GAN or WP:FAC rather than brand-new ones like this. Looking briefly at the article's talk page, I see that others have mentioned things that I might have mentioned, chiefly the article's dependence on a single source. Unless you can find other sources like newspaper articles that meet the guidelines at WP:RS, it will be hard to keep the article from being deleted. I think you would be wise to keep talking to other editors on the article's talk page to figure out how best to proceed. Finetooth ( talk) 06:56, 23 December 2010 (UTC)