This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like opinions of other editors on this article and to try and get an A-class rating. I know featured is highly unlikely considering the immense effort put out by
Juliancolton for the small article,
Tropical Storm Erick (2007), to become a FA.
Thanks, Cyclonebiskit ( talk) 03:26, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Finetooth comments: All tropical storms are interesting, even one this short-lived. I'm not sure how far you can take the article, but I'm certain it can be improved. Here are a few suggestions.
I hope these brief suggestions prove useful. It so, please consider reviewing another article, especially one from the backlog. Finetooth ( talk) 22:10, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like opinions of other editors on this article and to try and get an A-class rating. I know featured is highly unlikely considering the immense effort put out by
Juliancolton for the small article,
Tropical Storm Erick (2007), to become a FA.
Thanks, Cyclonebiskit ( talk) 03:26, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Finetooth comments: All tropical storms are interesting, even one this short-lived. I'm not sure how far you can take the article, but I'm certain it can be improved. Here are a few suggestions.
I hope these brief suggestions prove useful. It so, please consider reviewing another article, especially one from the backlog. Finetooth ( talk) 22:10, 19 October 2008 (UTC)