Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

Previous peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because… Let's make it worthy of being featured in the main page! I think it fulfills all criteria of an FA! Thanks, Yoichi Tachibana ( talk) 16:04, 4 March 2022 (UTC) reply

• I don't think this is eligible for PR, the nom is not a major contributor to the article. Keep in mind that FAC requires inline citations for all content outside lead and plot sections. ( t · c) buidhe 20:17, 14 March 2022 (UTC) reply