This article is quite stable (except for one time) and has references, notes, and sources. It has pictures, and it has enough information about the subject. Is there anything else wrong with this article? I feel like something might be unencylopedic around the Fleetway and Archie section, though, but I'm not sure. So is there anything wrong with it? -- 71.104.187.145 20:24, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, Rattleman, for moving the peer review to the right place, and thanks for those tips, AndyZ! And now I'll fix the history section up, merge the weaknesses and abilities together, and take away the word, "External links". And, I'll try to have an overview of the article. -- 71.104.187.145 03:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
I'll try to fix those up then. Thanks for the advice! -- 71.104.181.162 00:29, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
This article is quite stable (except for one time) and has references, notes, and sources. It has pictures, and it has enough information about the subject. Is there anything else wrong with this article? I feel like something might be unencylopedic around the Fleetway and Archie section, though, but I'm not sure. So is there anything wrong with it? -- 71.104.187.145 20:24, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, Rattleman, for moving the peer review to the right place, and thanks for those tips, AndyZ! And now I'll fix the history section up, merge the weaknesses and abilities together, and take away the word, "External links". And, I'll try to have an overview of the article. -- 71.104.187.145 03:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
I'll try to fix those up then. Thanks for the advice! -- 71.104.181.162 00:29, 26 March 2006 (UTC)