This peer review discussion has been closed.
In light of the new movie coming out this summer,
The X-Files: I Want to Believe, I think it would be great to feature the original X-Files article on the main page on or around its release date. Therefore I'd like to get it ready for an FA nomination. Unfortunately I don't think it's anywhere near that point yet. It's too long and too weighed down with fan cruft. Please post your thoughts on cutting it down and improving it, with FA in mind. Thanks!
Equazcion
•✗/
C •
17:54, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
I think that a problem that this article has had for a long time is that it has way too many fair use images. There aren't any related images in the Commons?
Lighthead
þ
21:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Wow, this article is huge. Much bigger than the last time I checked it out. I've taken a quick look at it and I won't beat about the bush here.
Although I have taken a quick read through I didn't notice a Production or Reception section. How was the series received by critics and fans throughout the years? There is some good detail in here and with some careful pruning will produce a FA in time. Nreive ( talk) 09:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that there was a section on 'early production issues'. That gave me an idea to create a separate article all relating to production issues. The reason being is that I notice that the run-on aspect mostly deals with production issues that could exist as its own article. Lighthead þ 01:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
This peer review discussion has been closed.
In light of the new movie coming out this summer,
The X-Files: I Want to Believe, I think it would be great to feature the original X-Files article on the main page on or around its release date. Therefore I'd like to get it ready for an FA nomination. Unfortunately I don't think it's anywhere near that point yet. It's too long and too weighed down with fan cruft. Please post your thoughts on cutting it down and improving it, with FA in mind. Thanks!
Equazcion
•✗/
C •
17:54, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
I think that a problem that this article has had for a long time is that it has way too many fair use images. There aren't any related images in the Commons?
Lighthead
þ
21:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Wow, this article is huge. Much bigger than the last time I checked it out. I've taken a quick look at it and I won't beat about the bush here.
Although I have taken a quick read through I didn't notice a Production or Reception section. How was the series received by critics and fans throughout the years? There is some good detail in here and with some careful pruning will produce a FA in time. Nreive ( talk) 09:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that there was a section on 'early production issues'. That gave me an idea to create a separate article all relating to production issues. The reason being is that I notice that the run-on aspect mostly deals with production issues that could exist as its own article. Lighthead þ 01:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)