Looks like a good start to me, just a few things on first glance..
Any time the title of the film is mentioned in the prose it should be italicized, The Third Alarm, not "The Third Alarm".
A section on themes should be sourced and well-cited to avoid
WP:OR. If you're intending to go for GA, I'd check the
WP:GACR page.
The presentation of the critical responses, with collapsible boxes and the images of the magazine covers seems to be more decorative than anything. I haven't seen any other film articles present their critical response sections like that. I'd check out recent GAs and FAs from
WP:FILM to get an idea of what a really good critical response section looks like.
Rfl0216 (
talk)
00:03, 10 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Looks like a good start to me, just a few things on first glance..
Any time the title of the film is mentioned in the prose it should be italicized, The Third Alarm, not "The Third Alarm".
A section on themes should be sourced and well-cited to avoid
WP:OR. If you're intending to go for GA, I'd check the
WP:GACR page.
The presentation of the critical responses, with collapsible boxes and the images of the magazine covers seems to be more decorative than anything. I haven't seen any other film articles present their critical response sections like that. I'd check out recent GAs and FAs from
WP:FILM to get an idea of what a really good critical response section looks like.
Rfl0216 (
talk)
00:03, 10 June 2020 (UTC)reply