The Last Temptation of Krust was recently listed as a Good Article. Looking for feedback/comments on ways to further improve the article's quality. Thanks for taking a look. Cirt ( talk) 09:15, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: Listed this Peer Review at WP:COMEDY, WP:DOH, WP:TV, and WP:US-TOON. Cirt ( talk) 10:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC).
- Automated review
- A script has been used to generate a semi- automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 03:37, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- Response to semi-automated peer review
- Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article. [?] -- Response: I think this is where "The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question." comes into play, the lead is actually longer than most Simpsons WP:GAs. Cirt ( talk) 04:24, 18 January 2008 (UTC).
- The script has spotted the following contractions: couldn't, Can't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded. -- Done , fixed one, the other is the title of a book. Cirt ( talk) 04:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC).
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [?] You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 03:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC) -- Response: Will do. Cirt ( talk) 04:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC).
The Last Temptation of Krust was recently listed as a Good Article. Looking for feedback/comments on ways to further improve the article's quality. Thanks for taking a look. Cirt ( talk) 09:15, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: Listed this Peer Review at WP:COMEDY, WP:DOH, WP:TV, and WP:US-TOON. Cirt ( talk) 10:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC).
- Automated review
- A script has been used to generate a semi- automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 03:37, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- Response to semi-automated peer review
- Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article. [?] -- Response: I think this is where "The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question." comes into play, the lead is actually longer than most Simpsons WP:GAs. Cirt ( talk) 04:24, 18 January 2008 (UTC).
- The script has spotted the following contractions: couldn't, Can't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded. -- Done , fixed one, the other is the title of a book. Cirt ( talk) 04:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC).
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [?] You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 03:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC) -- Response: Will do. Cirt ( talk) 04:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC).