Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I feel that after years of editing, the page has finally reached FA standards. Unlike most video game related articles seen on the site which focus mostly in
in universe aspects, The Conduit article gives a detailed account on the creation of the game, such as the technicals behind the creation of the games
engine and audio creation, as well as games marketing and release. As a side bonus, it would be fun if the article was featured in time for the
sequels release.
Thanks, Little Jimmy ( talk) 08:00, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
As someone who knows zip about this game and has never really looked at a video game article in any depth, I will make a great naive reviewer but a useless expert. What the hey.
You've done a great job here. My limited comments are a testament to that fact. I expect that once my concerns have been addressed, this'd sail through GAC; I'm not so sure about FAC. I hope my comments have been a help! Seegoon ( talk) 00:47, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback, I'll try to incorporate you're advice into the article when I get the time. Plus GA would probably be a better start than FA. Cheers! Little Jimmy ( talk) 13:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I feel that after years of editing, the page has finally reached FA standards. Unlike most video game related articles seen on the site which focus mostly in
in universe aspects, The Conduit article gives a detailed account on the creation of the game, such as the technicals behind the creation of the games
engine and audio creation, as well as games marketing and release. As a side bonus, it would be fun if the article was featured in time for the
sequels release.
Thanks, Little Jimmy ( talk) 08:00, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
As someone who knows zip about this game and has never really looked at a video game article in any depth, I will make a great naive reviewer but a useless expert. What the hey.
You've done a great job here. My limited comments are a testament to that fact. I expect that once my concerns have been addressed, this'd sail through GAC; I'm not so sure about FAC. I hope my comments have been a help! Seegoon ( talk) 00:47, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback, I'll try to incorporate you're advice into the article when I get the time. Plus GA would probably be a better start than FA. Cheers! Little Jimmy ( talk) 13:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)