Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… I want It to become a GA but, need peer reviews first.
Thanks, Mike 2 8 9 16:33, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Bearing in mind the peer review process is "intended for high-quality articles that have already undergone extensive work", there's unfortunately not a whole lot to go on here. It's quite a way from meeting the good article criteria. I will give some suggestions though. Apart from more content, if available, the article needs a thorough copyedit and more citations to reliable sources. Some suggestions:
I'm not sure what else to say based on the amount that's there, but I hope that helps. -- Beloved Freak 22:09, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… I want It to become a GA but, need peer reviews first.
Thanks, Mike 2 8 9 16:33, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Bearing in mind the peer review process is "intended for high-quality articles that have already undergone extensive work", there's unfortunately not a whole lot to go on here. It's quite a way from meeting the good article criteria. I will give some suggestions though. Apart from more content, if available, the article needs a thorough copyedit and more citations to reliable sources. Some suggestions:
I'm not sure what else to say based on the amount that's there, but I hope that helps. -- Beloved Freak 22:09, 29 August 2011 (UTC)