Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like some feedback as to how to improve this article to GA status. Some areas I've identified include:
I'd value some feedback.
Thanks, LT910001 ( talk) 00:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I just had a quick look at the article:
Best of luck with the undertaking. Kind regards JakobSteenberg ( talk) 10:57, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Ping to GrahamColm. Hello, GrahamColm, It's a pity our paths haven't crossed before. I heard you described as a "poop doctor" on WikiMed (an auspicious title, to be sure!) and assume that means gastroenterologist. I'm planning on getting to work on this article soon. In order to reach GA, excluding the issue with citations and finding an in vivo extra image, do you have any suggestions as to what would constitute adequate broadness? LT910001 ( talk) 02:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like some feedback as to how to improve this article to GA status. Some areas I've identified include:
I'd value some feedback.
Thanks, LT910001 ( talk) 00:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I just had a quick look at the article:
Best of luck with the undertaking. Kind regards JakobSteenberg ( talk) 10:57, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Ping to GrahamColm. Hello, GrahamColm, It's a pity our paths haven't crossed before. I heard you described as a "poop doctor" on WikiMed (an auspicious title, to be sure!) and assume that means gastroenterologist. I'm planning on getting to work on this article soon. In order to reach GA, excluding the issue with citations and finding an in vivo extra image, do you have any suggestions as to what would constitute adequate broadness? LT910001 ( talk) 02:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)