Toolbox |
---|
![]() | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review before nominating this for FA. The game isn't popular as it used to be, so some sources may be outdated.
Thanks, Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 13:46, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Jeromi Mikhael I also suggest that you review some articles at WP:FAC if you haven't already. This will help you understand the FA criteria so that you can further improve your article. It also builds goodwill among FAC regulars who will be more likely to review your article. Editors do not need to be an expert in the topic or in Wikipedia policy to review. In fact, FAC needs reviewers who are not experts to point out technical jargon and places they don't understand the prose in an article. I hope to see you there. Z1720 ( talk) 21:06, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Some comments from a very quick readthrough:
Will return if/when have the time. Urve ( talk) 04:19, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Hey! Sorry for not GA reviewing it, but here we are. The article is relatively short (nearing 30,000bytes), so you might see significant oppositions cause apparently some people think shorties can't be FA. To try prevent that, if you have more includable information I would recommend doing so. Gerald WL 06:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
![]() | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review before nominating this for FA. The game isn't popular as it used to be, so some sources may be outdated.
Thanks, Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 13:46, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Jeromi Mikhael I also suggest that you review some articles at WP:FAC if you haven't already. This will help you understand the FA criteria so that you can further improve your article. It also builds goodwill among FAC regulars who will be more likely to review your article. Editors do not need to be an expert in the topic or in Wikipedia policy to review. In fact, FAC needs reviewers who are not experts to point out technical jargon and places they don't understand the prose in an article. I hope to see you there. Z1720 ( talk) 21:06, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Some comments from a very quick readthrough:
Will return if/when have the time. Urve ( talk) 04:19, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Hey! Sorry for not GA reviewing it, but here we are. The article is relatively short (nearing 30,000bytes), so you might see significant oppositions cause apparently some people think shorties can't be FA. To try prevent that, if you have more includable information I would recommend doing so. Gerald WL 06:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)