This has been a feature article drive, and even though it's unrated (yet), I feel it is ready. I want comments, especially from some people who aren't familiar with Ice Hockey, to see how it can be improved. Thank you very much! The Evil Clown my contributions 14:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
This is what I wrote on the Stanley Cup talk page:
In the anecdotes and traditions section, we need a few citations. This is a general notice. The Evil Clown my contributions 15:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Other than those points, I think it could make a good case for FA status. Kaiser matias 17:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
As far as when the duplicate was made, it was in 1969. Why? Err, because the original was over 75 years old, had undergone a lot of wear and tear, and silver just isn't that rugged? RGTraynor 20:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Looked over the article again. It looks a lot better, and very well written. Should make the grade to FA if you submit it, I think. Kaiser matias 20:50, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
This has been a feature article drive, and even though it's unrated (yet), I feel it is ready. I want comments, especially from some people who aren't familiar with Ice Hockey, to see how it can be improved. Thank you very much! The Evil Clown my contributions 14:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
This is what I wrote on the Stanley Cup talk page:
In the anecdotes and traditions section, we need a few citations. This is a general notice. The Evil Clown my contributions 15:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Other than those points, I think it could make a good case for FA status. Kaiser matias 17:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
As far as when the duplicate was made, it was in 1969. Why? Err, because the original was over 75 years old, had undergone a lot of wear and tear, and silver just isn't that rugged? RGTraynor 20:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Looked over the article again. It looks a lot better, and very well written. Should make the grade to FA if you submit it, I think. Kaiser matias 20:50, 8 April 2007 (UTC)