I believe Son Goten is nearly a decent article; the article contains decent images, describes his appearance, and the like. But, I think the article has a lack of organization, verifiability, and information, if possible.
SGFF01:35, 25 September 2006 (UTC)reply
From the most obvious to the less obvious:
The article is mainly written from an in-uinverse perspective (as if he were alive), while it should be from an out-universe perspective (talking as a character). See
the guideline for fictional characters.
Without references or sources, most can be considered
weasel and
peacock terms, in example, Goten is famous for his mispronunciation, In Dragon Ball GT (which most fans consider non-canon), etc.
Too much
original research: It is possible that Goten had the potiental to become the strongest Saiyan., The ease at which he does so has been a matter of fan controversy, Another theory is that the strength of a child, It is unknown who won the bout but it is safe to assume that Goten won, etc.
In the Power section, there is a bold Super Saiyan. There is no sense having a subtitle there.
The movies and videogames sections are lists, which are usually frowned upon. Try expanding the character's participation there.
That is all I can say after a quick glance. Overall, it would be nice if you could find references, and rewrite the article from an out-of-universe perspective (authors' comments, why he was named in that way, why Toriyama decided to make him similar in appearance as Goku, while Gohan was so different, when he first appeared in the manga and in the anime, etc). If you need more comments, I can do that sometime later. --
ReyBrujo02:15, 25 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Maybe the Japanese Wiki would be a good source (or other languages). We would need a translator for that, though. However, you can use Google as a translator.
SGFF03:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)reply
I believe Son Goten is nearly a decent article; the article contains decent images, describes his appearance, and the like. But, I think the article has a lack of organization, verifiability, and information, if possible.
SGFF01:35, 25 September 2006 (UTC)reply
From the most obvious to the less obvious:
The article is mainly written from an in-uinverse perspective (as if he were alive), while it should be from an out-universe perspective (talking as a character). See
the guideline for fictional characters.
Without references or sources, most can be considered
weasel and
peacock terms, in example, Goten is famous for his mispronunciation, In Dragon Ball GT (which most fans consider non-canon), etc.
Too much
original research: It is possible that Goten had the potiental to become the strongest Saiyan., The ease at which he does so has been a matter of fan controversy, Another theory is that the strength of a child, It is unknown who won the bout but it is safe to assume that Goten won, etc.
In the Power section, there is a bold Super Saiyan. There is no sense having a subtitle there.
The movies and videogames sections are lists, which are usually frowned upon. Try expanding the character's participation there.
That is all I can say after a quick glance. Overall, it would be nice if you could find references, and rewrite the article from an out-of-universe perspective (authors' comments, why he was named in that way, why Toriyama decided to make him similar in appearance as Goku, while Gohan was so different, when he first appeared in the manga and in the anime, etc). If you need more comments, I can do that sometime later. --
ReyBrujo02:15, 25 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Maybe the Japanese Wiki would be a good source (or other languages). We would need a translator for that, though. However, you can use Google as a translator.
SGFF03:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)reply