Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because during the
GA review no problems were raised and it was suggested I bring it to FA. I was lenient considering the article is only 4,000 characters, but per
WP:WTHN, I figured I'll give it a shot. Thanks,
Giants
27(
c|
s) 22:59, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: While I do not have a problem with the length per se, I do think the article could use some more detail to provide context to the reader before any FAC, so here are some suggestions for improvement based on that and some MOS issues.
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). I do not watch peer reviews, so if you have questions or comments, please contact me on my talk page. Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 04:26, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because during the
GA review no problems were raised and it was suggested I bring it to FA. I was lenient considering the article is only 4,000 characters, but per
WP:WTHN, I figured I'll give it a shot. Thanks,
Giants
27(
c|
s) 22:59, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: While I do not have a problem with the length per se, I do think the article could use some more detail to provide context to the reader before any FAC, so here are some suggestions for improvement based on that and some MOS issues.
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). I do not watch peer reviews, so if you have questions or comments, please contact me on my talk page. Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 04:26, 23 October 2009 (UTC)