Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I added this for peer review again, because the peer review took to long (15 days) and nobody answered. The text above is from the first archive--
♫Greatorangepumpkin♫
T
11:14, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
hello,
I've added this article to peer review, because I want to know, if this article may be a FL. But I'm not sure in few things:
thx -- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 19:20, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Request: I am prepared to review the article, but could you remove the coloured effect from the above list, so that I can read it more easily? It's a great strain at the moment. Brianboulton ( talk) 16:44, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
[Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission —
JohnFromPinckney
19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments: First, I apologise for the delay in getting to this, having promised a review. I have had very limited online time this week, with several things to keep abreast of. I am grateful to JohnFromPinckney for his detailed review. I don't want to repeat his points, so I'll just say a few things:-
I hope these few suggestions are helpful. Brianboulton ( talk) 00:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
(Later): I've no idea why you thought it a good idea to close the review, open a new one, post the old comments to the new one and then insult the editors who previously took time to help you. I can't be bothered to delete my comments, but my interest in this review has finished. Brianboulton ( talk) 20:35, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I added this for peer review again, because the peer review took to long (15 days) and nobody answered. The text above is from the first archive--
♫Greatorangepumpkin♫
T
11:14, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
hello,
I've added this article to peer review, because I want to know, if this article may be a FL. But I'm not sure in few things:
thx -- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 19:20, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Request: I am prepared to review the article, but could you remove the coloured effect from the above list, so that I can read it more easily? It's a great strain at the moment. Brianboulton ( talk) 16:44, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
[Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission —
JohnFromPinckney
19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Text from JohnFromPinckney removed as copied without permission — JohnFromPinckney 19:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments: First, I apologise for the delay in getting to this, having promised a review. I have had very limited online time this week, with several things to keep abreast of. I am grateful to JohnFromPinckney for his detailed review. I don't want to repeat his points, so I'll just say a few things:-
I hope these few suggestions are helpful. Brianboulton ( talk) 00:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
(Later): I've no idea why you thought it a good idea to close the review, open a new one, post the old comments to the new one and then insult the editors who previously took time to help you. I can't be bothered to delete my comments, but my interest in this review has finished. Brianboulton ( talk) 20:35, 18 October 2010 (UTC)