I am re-resubmitting this article for peer review. It has changed alot, for better or for worst. There was quite a bit of struggle over this article, with people going in and making giant changes, thinking they were improving, but not necessarially helping. I feel like the article is somewhat of a mess right now, and have taken quite a long break from it, persuing other articles in the interim. I would like to dive back into it, but I really would like some perspectives. Thanks --[[User:JonMoore| —Jo nMo ore 20:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)]] 02:49, 12 July 2005 (UTC) Note: Old PR's can be found at: Wikipedia:Peer review/Salt Lake City, Utah/archive1 and Wikipedia:Peer review/Salt Lake City, Utah/archive2.
It has some strong areas and some weak ones, here are some things I think could still be worked on:
More generally I think all stats should have inline citations, and all the images need to have GFDL compatible copyrights. -- nixie 09:06, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
In its current state it won't make it to the FA list. I won't review the text, but I'll comment on the presentation for now.
I promise to review it once the above are taken care of. =Nichalp «Talk»= 12:29, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
I am re-resubmitting this article for peer review. It has changed alot, for better or for worst. There was quite a bit of struggle over this article, with people going in and making giant changes, thinking they were improving, but not necessarially helping. I feel like the article is somewhat of a mess right now, and have taken quite a long break from it, persuing other articles in the interim. I would like to dive back into it, but I really would like some perspectives. Thanks --[[User:JonMoore| —Jo nMo ore 20:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)]] 02:49, 12 July 2005 (UTC) Note: Old PR's can be found at: Wikipedia:Peer review/Salt Lake City, Utah/archive1 and Wikipedia:Peer review/Salt Lake City, Utah/archive2.
It has some strong areas and some weak ones, here are some things I think could still be worked on:
More generally I think all stats should have inline citations, and all the images need to have GFDL compatible copyrights. -- nixie 09:06, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
In its current state it won't make it to the FA list. I won't review the text, but I'll comment on the presentation for now.
I promise to review it once the above are taken care of. =Nichalp «Talk»= 12:29, July 12, 2005 (UTC)