I think that
Rush (band) (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) is very close to FA status, and I'd like some extra eyes on it as that goal is approached. Citations have been...well, cited as one thing that may hold it back, and, in my opinion, that's all it really needs. I think this article needs some feedback from the rest of the community as a whole now. —
BorgHunter
ubx (
talk) 16:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
A few things:
Deckiller 15:59, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Just from a quick glance: The complete lack of references is definately the article's biggest problem. Another problem are the images: They all lack fair use rationales, and most of them are uploaded too large to qualify as fair use. The discography also seems to make unnecessary use of fair use images (the album covers). Also, years and month are overlinked: Both should generally not be linked, unless part of a complete date (e.g.
February 24
2006), see
date formatting. And the RIAA certifications under Awards seem to just repeat what was already listed in the discography. --
Fritz Saalfeld (
Talk) 23:43, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Some problems:
-- Kevin Myers | (complaint dept.) 17:44, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
I have begun to work on the above observations/suggestions Wisdom89 21:08, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
I think that
Rush (band) (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) is very close to FA status, and I'd like some extra eyes on it as that goal is approached. Citations have been...well, cited as one thing that may hold it back, and, in my opinion, that's all it really needs. I think this article needs some feedback from the rest of the community as a whole now. —
BorgHunter
ubx (
talk) 16:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
A few things:
Deckiller 15:59, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Just from a quick glance: The complete lack of references is definately the article's biggest problem. Another problem are the images: They all lack fair use rationales, and most of them are uploaded too large to qualify as fair use. The discography also seems to make unnecessary use of fair use images (the album covers). Also, years and month are overlinked: Both should generally not be linked, unless part of a complete date (e.g.
February 24
2006), see
date formatting. And the RIAA certifications under Awards seem to just repeat what was already listed in the discography. --
Fritz Saalfeld (
Talk) 23:43, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Some problems:
-- Kevin Myers | (complaint dept.) 17:44, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
I have begun to work on the above observations/suggestions Wisdom89 21:08, 14 March 2006 (UTC)