Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it has undergone significant editing and restructing since the last peer review. I would also suggest increasing its importance to those of the other English public schools - though it should clearly be lower than Eton, Harrow, Rugby and Winchester.

Thanks, ( LennyLeonardson ( talk) 01:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)) reply

• A script has been used to generate a semi- automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR  _t 05:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC) reply