I'd disagree with the two previous comments- the criterion for an FA is not length, but rather comprehensiveness. Plenty of short articles have been promoted: the textbook example is
Hurricane Irene (2005). Since this is such a narrow topic I think that the article is comprehensive despite its short length. I personally would vote support if this were put up for FAC, though I am not confident that it will pass. The most pressing need is a picture. Could you somehow get a picture of the chapel, or of Father Moretti?
Borisblue05:01, 15 October 2006 (UTC)reply
I agree with this, but there was a lot of opposition to that article being promoted, based upon its length. As I said, they're usually longer, and most FAs are more lengthy than this is.
Lankiveil00:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC).reply
I'd disagree with the two previous comments- the criterion for an FA is not length, but rather comprehensiveness. Plenty of short articles have been promoted: the textbook example is
Hurricane Irene (2005). Since this is such a narrow topic I think that the article is comprehensive despite its short length. I personally would vote support if this were put up for FAC, though I am not confident that it will pass. The most pressing need is a picture. Could you somehow get a picture of the chapel, or of Father Moretti?
Borisblue05:01, 15 October 2006 (UTC)reply
I agree with this, but there was a lot of opposition to that article being promoted, based upon its length. As I said, they're usually longer, and most FAs are more lengthy than this is.
Lankiveil00:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC).reply