Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

Recently, the article was rated as B-Class on the quality scale. I've listed it for peer review so I can find out what can be done to get it to GA status. Thanks, Cognissonance ( talk) 22:34, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

I've been asked to review this article, but I am not sure I am confident enough in my knowledge of the criteria to be able to do so. My apologies 331dot ( talk) 20:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Same, although I can go through the article and apply WP:VG guideline edits. ~ Dissident93 ^{( talk)} 00:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Looking through the sources, besides a little nitpick of using the Kotaku Australia article rather than the article from Kotaku (nothing important to that), the article uses a source from CGMagazine, which was already determined to be unreliable here on Wikipedia. GamerPro64 20:25, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

CGMagazine replaced. I only chose Kotaku Australia to confirm the Australian release date. Cognissonance ( talk) 21:23, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply