Quark
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because, although all of the obvious issues with it have been fixed during the ongoing
featured article nomination, I think a review of the article by someone more expert in quantum chromodynamics would help locating less obvious problems, if there are any.
Thanks, A r m y 1 9 8 7 ! ! ! 15:46, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- Please read the FAC instructions; FACs and peer reviews should not be open simultaneously. Nousernamesleft ( talk) 00:36, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- A script has been used to generate a semi- automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 01:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I archived this per the PR and FAC instructions APR t 01:35, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Quark
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because, although all of the obvious issues with it have been fixed during the ongoing
featured article nomination, I think a review of the article by someone more expert in quantum chromodynamics would help locating less obvious problems, if there are any.
Thanks, A r m y 1 9 8 7 ! ! ! 15:46, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- Please read the FAC instructions; FACs and peer reviews should not be open simultaneously. Nousernamesleft ( talk) 00:36, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- A script has been used to generate a semi- automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 01:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I archived this per the PR and FAC instructions APR t 01:35, 29 September 2008 (UTC)