Toolbox |
---|
![]() | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because it's been almost a year and a half since the last one. Since then, it was promoted to Good Article status in December last year. Right now, I want me and other users to work on the article to help it reach Featured Article status in the future. In my opinion, the foundations are there: it has well-developed Development and Reception sections, and the plot section is fairly comprehensive for a series of its length. Anyway, what parts of the article need to be improved for it to have a chance of passing a Featured Article nomination?
Thanks, Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 03:04, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Hey, I didn't take a huge look at this article, but I thought I'd point out a few things:
I hope these few points help. This is a pretty darn good article.-- Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
![]() | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because it's been almost a year and a half since the last one. Since then, it was promoted to Good Article status in December last year. Right now, I want me and other users to work on the article to help it reach Featured Article status in the future. In my opinion, the foundations are there: it has well-developed Development and Reception sections, and the plot section is fairly comprehensive for a series of its length. Anyway, what parts of the article need to be improved for it to have a chance of passing a Featured Article nomination?
Thanks, Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 03:04, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Hey, I didn't take a huge look at this article, but I thought I'd point out a few things:
I hope these few points help. This is a pretty darn good article.-- Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)