Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I'm working on this article with two other people; it recently achieved Good Article status and we hope to get it to FA status in the future. The GA reviewer left some feedback on FAC when passing it, which we've addressed. We'd like to know how the article could be improved before we nominate it as a featured article.
Thanks, ItsZippy ( talk • contributions) 22:09, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments: Wow, scary stuff! The article is commendably calm, presenting this strange theology without a whiff of sensationlism. Impressive work; my points are all fairly trivial:-
I hope these points are helpful. As I cannot watch individual peer review pages, please contact my talk page if you wish to discuss anything arising from this review with me. Please let me know if you decide to submit it to FAC; I'd be curious to see how it is received there. Brianboulton ( talk) 00:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I'm working on this article with two other people; it recently achieved Good Article status and we hope to get it to FA status in the future. The GA reviewer left some feedback on FAC when passing it, which we've addressed. We'd like to know how the article could be improved before we nominate it as a featured article.
Thanks, ItsZippy ( talk • contributions) 22:09, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments: Wow, scary stuff! The article is commendably calm, presenting this strange theology without a whiff of sensationlism. Impressive work; my points are all fairly trivial:-
I hope these points are helpful. As I cannot watch individual peer review pages, please contact my talk page if you wish to discuss anything arising from this review with me. Please let me know if you decide to submit it to FAC; I'd be curious to see how it is received there. Brianboulton ( talk) 00:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC)